Bitbucket Data Center vs Sonatype Nexus Repository comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "In my opinion, the pricing is very fair and very customer-oriented. It's much better than any other tool I have used so far."
  • "It seems like a fair price, based on other software solutions I've purchased."
  • "It's quite expensive. They are charging around $110 or $120 per user, per year. It's quite expensive in comparison to the other tools available in the market."
  • "Nexus Repository Manager Pro is quite affordable because it's about €100, per user, per year. Purchasing licenses was not really a big issue for us. Regarding Nexus IQ, it's much more expensive. We purchased 250 licenses and they cost us about €120,000."
  • "One of the challenges we had around licensing was how to deal with anonymous requests. According to the letter of the contract, an anonymous request consumes a license. We had to do some work to get over the fact that any anonymous interactions with the Repository product had to be put back to an end-user account."
  • "There were costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. The standard is free."
  • "The cost is managed by the client."
  • "I use the open-source version of the product, which is free of cost."
  • More Sonatype Nexus Repository Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Repository Managers solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Primarily, the extensive support for a wide range of packages is a crucial factor. The effectiveness of new-age package managers is often determined by the breadth of packages they can handle. In this… more »
    Top Answer:I use the open-source version of the product, which is free of cost.
    Top Answer:Particularly concerning OSF-type licenses, while they support a multitude of features, there's room for improvement in the single point transform, especially for grouping. It appears that currently… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    601
    Comparisons
    416
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    Views
    8,910
    Comparisons
    3,159
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    497
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Nexus Repository, Nexus Repository Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    Each node in your Data Center cluster increases capacity for concurrent users without sacrificing performance.

    Increase application throughput to avoid performance degradation in the event of load spikes.

    Dedicate nodes for automated tasks to ensure the highest possible quality of service for critical teams within your organization.

    Nexus Repository is powered by Repository Manager, the same technology engine found in our OSS version deployed at more than 100,000 organziations world-wide. It is Built on the shoulders of Maven, Repository Manager supports all popular component formats and brings your entire development organization together. It includes staging and release functionality that provides support for operations and quality assurance processes prior to production and gives you instant insight into potential component security, license, and quality issues, enabling teams to take corrective action early and quickly.
    Sample Customers
    Splunk, Cisco, Ciena, Blackboard, Amadeus
    Goldman Sachs, Toyota, Disney, Deutsche Bank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Government11%
    Recreational Facilities/Services Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    JFrog Artifactory vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about JFrog Artifactory vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bitbucket Data Center is ranked 4th in Repository Managers while Sonatype Nexus Repository is ranked 1st in Repository Managers with 15 reviews. Bitbucket Data Center is rated 8.0, while Sonatype Nexus Repository is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitbucket Data Center writes "I like the clustering, smart mirroring and DRP capabilities. Auto-merge is one of the unique features of this SCM". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Nexus Repository writes "Feature-rich and seamless integration with our other tools". Bitbucket Data Center is most compared with JFrog Artifactory and Archiva, whereas Sonatype Nexus Repository is most compared with JFrog Artifactory, Archiva, Inedo ProGet, EMCO Remote Installer and EMCO MSI Package Builder.

    See our list of best Repository Managers vendors.

    We monitor all Repository Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.