We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and IBM Rational ClearCase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."We have a couple of different tools that allow us to tie source code changes to report bugs. It's integrated with a bug tracking system and also integrated with what requires a tracking system. So we have better facilities. We get with the command line and can type all that stuff in and get the same kind of trust, but when we d it all manually, it's not likely to happen."
"Bitbucket works fine for what I'm doing. It's slightly different from GitHub, but it's a good tool for storing code."
"Bitbucket is a standard source code repository with all the features you would expect. It supports Git and SVN. It's an extensive tool that provides us with merging, branching, and change management capabilities. You can compare the changes with the current and previous versions."
"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."
"Bitbucket is a standard git implementation with perfectly coordinated screens, it's secure, and we have had no problems with it."
"The code reviews and the ability to support DevSecOps are very important."
"Code check in and code version control."
"Bitbucket has a pull request-based method, similar to Git's merge request feature."
"IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."
"ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment."
"Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve."
"The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved."
"The product could be less expensive for small companies."
"When users are given access for the first time, they should have some basic setups to help them specify their purposes."
"Bitbucket's usability and integration with other tools could be improved somewhat. My other issue is that Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, and all the other ones use slightly different jargon for the same things. They should come up with a standard language for all these tools."
"Technical support is not very fast."
"Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."
"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."
"I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly."
"The protection needs to be improved."
Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while IBM Rational ClearCase is ranked 8th in Version Control with 5 reviews. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while IBM Rational ClearCase is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearCase writes "Difficult to use, not efficient, but stable". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and Git, whereas IBM Rational ClearCase is most compared with Git, GitHub, IBM Rational ClearQuest, Helix Core and Apache Subversion.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.