We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The stability is very good."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It never fails. Bitdefender always catches all of the viruses that have been detected on customer sites."
"I find Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus to be a pretty good solution for the mid-level market, specifically for organizations with up to two hundred fifty users. I like that it is an averagely priced solution. It also has a straightforward installation that can be completed within three to five minutes. Its technical support is also good enough."
"The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is highly stable."
"The pricing is decent."
"The performance for Kaspersky is good, and it's not impacted our client performance."
"The product has an easy-to-use EDR module based on signature-based antivirus detection. It is a complete software."
"Encryption is the most valuable feature. It creates an encryption tunnel from your location to the delivery address."
"We've found the solution to be stable."
"My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability."
"It is easy to manage."
"We can scale the solution."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The solution is not stable."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"Detections could be improved."
"The mobile version needs improvement."
"Adding a feature like Data Loss Prevention would be beneficial."
"The solution seems to be pretty amateur for an EDR solution, and it should be more in sync in terms of features, with solutions such as FireEye and SentinelOne."
"Kaspersky EDR lacks protection from recent ransomware."
"The prices can go down a little bit."
"Installing Kaspersky is complex. It requires more work from system admins and takes almost one week to deploy, including integration and mapping with other solutions. You also have to configure Kaspersky EDR sandboxing then set up permissions for various teams and customers."
"It does not cover all of our security issues."
"Could include some additional protection."
"The system can be heavy, slowing down performance."
"The solution is expensive."
"Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is ranked 49th in EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) with 3 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 16th in EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) with 38 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is rated 7.6, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus writes "Averagely priced, has a straightforward installation, and worth recommending to the mid-level market, but its performance needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Provides inbound and outbound scanning, data loss protection, and encryption". Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is most compared with Trend Vision One, HP Wolf Security, Darktrace, CrowdStrike Falcon and Open EDR, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and Elastic Security. See our Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.
See our list of best EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) vendors.
We monitor all EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.