We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Norton Security Premium [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"GravityZone can be controlled from the cloud."
"Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's installation is straightforward."
"Bitdefender GravityZone EDR needs to be more stable."
"The Ultra is a valuable feature."
"Useful for the day-to-day analysis of the security infrastructure."
"I like that you can manage all the time and you can uninstall and install everything via the web console."
"The solution is probably one of the top five, best security solutions on the market at the moment."
"It efficiently investigates security incidents."
"With the heightened security around phishing, identity theft, and malware, this is a good product."
"The antivirus aspect of the solution is very good."
"The dashboard is good."
"Security Premium's best features are blocking, notifications, and the user interface."
"The product is called Norton 360 all-in-one. It is a full product."
"The most valuable feature is the quick installation."
"The most valuable feature is the multifunctional protection."
"The internet security was a plus, and it's pretty good."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"Detections could be improved."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The support needs improvement."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"There's room for improvement in terms of protection. That's my primary concern."
"We find it's making the machines run slow."
"They were working on the encryption management for laptops, and if they complete it then it would be helpful."
"The interface could be improved."
"Application Control should be available on the cloud."
"The only problem we have, and I don't know if maybe it's the package we bought, is that it lacks the parts of data protection and application blacklisting."
"The main area for improvement is the dashboard of the cloud console, where we manage security policies and groupings. It needs to be more flexible and informative."
"I would like to see the capability for remote installation added, in particular for servers."
"Having a dashboard that shows the different functions of Norton Security Premium can convince end users that the software is more than just an antivirus solution. This product offers several features, but end users think that it's just one out of the box solution, because the different functions are not explained in detail."
"Occasionally when you open a ticket, there's a lack of understanding that prevents the solution from being resolved directly."
"The only problem with Norton Antivirus is that it consumes a lot of resources like CPU and memory in the background. Whenever it's scanning, my laptop becomes very slow, and the worst part is you cannot do anything about it. As this product is secured by my local IT team, you cannot even kill that process, and that's what I've felt about many other antivirus solutions. I'm using McAfee for personal use, and I have the same problem."
"The product could always be more secure."
"Security Premium's cost could be lower."
"The product is an antivirus, it should be updated automatically when needed."
"The solution can improve the security modules."
"It would be helpful for me if this solution works on our cloud backup data."
More Norton Security Premium [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 15th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 54 reviews while Norton Security Premium [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 13 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while Norton Security Premium [EOL] is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Norton Security Premium [EOL] writes "User-friendly solution with good blocking". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Intercept X Endpoint and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Norton Security Premium [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.