Compare Bitglass vs. CipherCloud

Bitglass is ranked 10th in Cloud Access Security Brokers while CipherCloud is ranked 12th in Cloud Access Security Brokers. Bitglass is rated 0, while CipherCloud is rated 0. On the other hand, Bitglass is most compared with Netskope CASB, MVision Cloud and Microsoft Cloud App Security, whereas CipherCloud is most compared with Netskope CASB, Bitglass and MVision Cloud.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bitglass Logo
2,108 views|1,551 comparisons
CipherCloud Logo
806 views|569 comparisons
Ranking
Views
2,108
Comparisons
1,551
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
806
Comparisons
569
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Bitglass Next-Gen CSG
Learn
Bitglass
CipherCloud
Overview

The Bitglass OmniTM multi-protocol proxy architecture ensures that all data, whether accessed from a managed or unmanaged device, is subject to the visibility and control required by the organization, while simultaneously preserving employee privacy across personal applications. Omni Agentless, Bitglass’ reverse proxy capability, leverages patent pending AJAX-VM technology to ensure application resilience. Competitive CASBs either rely entirely on cumbersome agent-based forward proxy solutions, or suffer from breakages and downtime as cloud providers update and change their applications.

CipherCloud provides a single platform to secure sensitive customer data across multiple public and private cloud applications, without impacting functionality or performance.
Offer
Learn more about Bitglass
Learn more about CipherCloud
Sample Customers
UNC-CharlotteMitsubishi UFJ Global Custody
We monitor all Cloud Access Security Brokers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.