• Home
  • Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management vs. Fusion Framework System

Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management vs Fusion Framework System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
IT Vendor Risk Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Fusion Framework System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Vendor Risk Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Julian Shen
User-friendly solution with robust patch management capabilities
BitSight is good for us because we require third-party monitoring of vendors as per our new regulations. Since we are a financial company, we need... Read more →
Use Fusion Framework System?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution's price is average."
  • "The product has a reasonable price."

    • More Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about BitSight?
    Top Answer:The solution is user-friendly.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BitSight?
    Top Answer:The product is a little expensive and very oriented to large companies.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with BitSight?
    Top Answer:We face difficulties in acquiring designs and findings. There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side of BitSight.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What are the pros and cons of Fusion Risk Management and MetricStream Op ...
    Top Answer:Here are some of the pros and cons of Fusion Risk Management and MetricStream for Operational Resilience and Business Continuity Fusion Risk Management Pros: Fusion Risk Management is an… more »
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 36 in IT Vendor Risk Management
    Views
    2,392
    Comparisons
    1,767
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    407
    Rating
    8.5
    20th
    out of 36 in IT Vendor Risk Management
    Views
    218
    Comparisons
    104
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    BitSight
    Fusion Risk Management
    Overview

    BitSight transforms how organizations manage cyber risk. The BitSight Security Ratings Platform applies sophisticated algorithms, producing daily security ratings that range from 250 to 900, to help organizations manage their own security performance; mitigate third party risk; underwrite cyber insurance policies; conduct financial diligence; and assess aggregate risk. With over 2,100 global customers and the largest ecosystem of users and information, BitSight is the Standard in Security Ratings. For more information, please visit www.bitsight.com, read our blog or follow @BitSight on Twitter.

    Fusion helps your company prepare, manage, and act in any situation with our unique combination of consulting services and software solutions, including our award-winning software, the Fusion Framework System.

    The Fusion Framework creates tailored and engaging experiences for all contributors, automates much of the administration workload, and establishes an information foundation that can be used to make better decisions. Check out how Fusion can redefine your business continuity, disaster recovery, and risk management programs.

    Sample Customers
    Fannie Mae, Cabela's, BNP Paribas, PWC, AIR Worldwide, Con Edison, The Container Store, OshKosh, Steris, University of South Florida, Emblem Health, Lloyds Bank
    Aureon, ETS, Discount Tire, Box,
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company9%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business3%
    Midsize Enterprise43%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Vendor Risk Management
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management is ranked 2nd in IT Vendor Risk Management with 5 reviews while Fusion Framework System is ranked 20th in IT Vendor Risk Management. Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management is rated 8.6, while Fusion Framework System is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management writes "User-friendly solution with robust patch management capabilities". On the other hand, Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management is most compared with SecurityScorecard, RiskRecon, Microsoft Secure Score, UpGuard Vendor Risk and Tenable Lumin, whereas Fusion Framework System is most compared with RSA Archer.

    See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

    We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.