Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bizagi Logo
2,158 views|1,921 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Knack Logo
448 views|282 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bizagi and Knack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand.""The user interface is pretty good.""It is quite a stable solution.""The tool helps to improve business processes and have better KPIs. Also, it is easy to use. Our developers find it easy to learn.""It is easy to use and easy to learn. It is also fully compatible with BPMN virtual tool. Bizagi is very fast in responding to and fixing the issues.""The visualizations and attachments provided by the product are valuable.""The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability.""Very, very stable."

More Bizagi Pros →

"The security is the most valuable feature, in particular, the way I can give different access to different areas to different people, so you can really fine-tune access for different users."

More Knack Pros →

Cons
"Can be difficult for new users.""Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi.""The open source version lacks the option to publish.""From a developer's point of view, an improvement in the layout would make the UI better.""Bizagi needs a way to define categories such as process groups like the APQC framework, PCF, and handle the processes within it.""Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC.""It needs some better notation functionality.""The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."

More Bizagi Cons →

"The user interface for the systems that you build can use some improvement because as it is now, you have to do a lot of HTML and CSS to make it look modern."

More Knack Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good value for money."
  • "For the prices, we didn't try a negotiations about licensing or pricing, but if i can say a word about this, I find Bizagi prices to be well thought out."
  • "The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."
  • "It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."
  • "If they can freeze the pricing in a contract, I advise them to do so."
  • "I think that its price is reasonable."
  • "This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."
  • "The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."
  • More Bizagi Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This product has really good value, as it doesn't have a per-user cost, there's a flat fee."
  • More Knack Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load… more »
    Top Answer:The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,158
    Comparisons
    1,921
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    785
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    448
    Comparisons
    282
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Camunda logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Visio logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Bonita logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Microsoft Power Apps logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    ARIS BPA logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Caspio logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Microsoft Power Apps logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Salesforce Platform logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Amazon AWS logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    AppSheet logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Learn More
    Knack
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

    Knack helps non-programmers easily build beautiful, data-driven web apps. Data can be imported from spreadsheets and converted to an online database. Tools like search, forms, and tables are used to build web apps that work with the data. Apps can be published to any site and adapt to the surrounding design. Multiple versions can be published to different sites and for different audiences. Developers can extend these apps with a RESTful API, custom CSS, and JS event handlers.

    Sample Customers
    adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.
    Siemens Kaiser Permanente VMware SunChemical C.R. England Philips The Salvation Army United Way U.S. Green Building Council Cambridge University Press
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government14%
    Retailer8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Real Estate/Law Firm12%
    Government9%
    Construction Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bizagi is ranked 13th in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Knack is ranked 30th in Rapid Application Development Software. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while Knack is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Knack writes "Flexible and granular security options, good filtering, and the pricing model is cost-effective". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas Knack is most compared with Caspio, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform, Amazon AWS and AppSheet.

    See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best No-Code Development Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.