We performed a comparison between Bizagi and Red Hat Polymita Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The initial setup is super simple."
"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."
"The API is pretty straightforward."
"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."
"The product enables the users to automate the processes and provides a good user experience."
"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"The documentation capabilities are very good. Very structured documents and process versions are valuable features, and being able to communicate that to our customers is also a very good feature. It has a good balance between the effort and the result. So, you don't need to be too detailed. You can document while you are modeling, which is a very good feature."
"The product has a comfortable GUI and a good environment for users."
"The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."
"We have migrated to the cloud, but there are a lot of issues while integrating with the cloud. There are a lot of things to improve with the cloud and reporting. We were previously working with on-premise solutions, and we had access to a lot of things, but with the cloud, they changed a lot of functionalities. Some of the things we know, but with some of the things, we are having difficulties."
"It would be useful if we can connect Bizagi to other solutions, such as a local financial solution or Power BI. It would also be good and helpful to be able to connect Bizagi to some services solutions. It should also support right-to-left languages, such as Arabic."
"The open source version lacks the option to publish."
"One part of the university has changed its regular desktops to Linux. This is a weak point because Bizagi doesn't run on Linux. I would like the opportunity to run the software inside of Linux."
"There could be more documentation."
"The solution needs to make it easier to use RPA products on it. They may need an RPA specific interface. It would be better than having to make an RPA tool to use for viewing. Most of our work is about making RPA tools with the Bizagi, not using Bizagi itself."
"From a developer's point of view, an improvement in the layout would make the UI better."
"Framework approach, which extends to reusability in tools, like Pega, for deployment management could be improved."
"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."
More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Bizagi is ranked 7th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 78 reviews while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 50th in Business Process Management (BPM). Bizagi is rated 8.4, while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
