We performed a comparison between Bizagi and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Bizagi is really great for beginners because it's user-friendly and you can learn in it quickly, whereas other similar software are harder."
"The user logic is very easy to understand, even for people who are not engineers nor developers."
"The most valuable feature is the simulation."
"With the appropriate governance framework, properly trained business analysts can be empowered to design and build business solutions themselves."
"I like the ease of use and the fact that you can download and use their free version, which is unlimited. However, while it's unlimited use, some features aren't available."
"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard."
"Bizagi is a very useful tool because it does not require you to program. The user logic is very easy to understand even for people who are not engineers or developers."
"The API is pretty straightforward."
"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."
"It is highly user-friendly and easy to use, even for those who are not familiar with product modeling."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager is very responsive."
"The benefit of this application is that I can immediately describe processes and form normative documents for these processes. For me, this is definitely a plus. Сurrently, I work in a company that is not involved in the structural alignment of business processes. They have huge gaps in this. Nothing is described and there are no norms. Therefore, the formation of regulatory documents, rules, and descriptions of processes, not only in graphic form, but also in documentary form is an absolute plus. I have not found this in other process programs."
"Process Manager supports end-to-end transformation. Students can better understand end-to-end activity and processes as well as how they are run. For teaching, it's process discovery, then modeling, and finally optimization and simulation, partly. Typically, we showcase some simulation of the processes, and this is where we finish. That is why we validate that it's properly designed, but also what are the outcomes of modeled processes. There are also options for discussion on process optimization."
"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."
"I have done a lot of modeling over quite a number of years, and I think that the modeling capabilities in Signavio are state of the art."
"Version management is helpful because I like to try different versions and then decide which of them should be the main model."
"The on-premise software has some bugs."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."
"I would like to see more in terms of analytics and better reporting."
"Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."
"Also, the tool sometimes feels not so mature when we find random deploy errors from testing to production environment."
"One part of the university has changed its regular desktops to Linux. This is a weak point because Bizagi doesn't run on Linux. I would like the opportunity to run the software inside of Linux."
"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager needs better automatic rendering of data."
"It is not easy to learn the product."
"Moreover, the functionality to show different process variations with "views" could be improved to allow more customization of these views. I believe this would increase the user experience and administrative efforts maintaining these process variations."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."
"There is a need for more varied access packages. The access packages that I have used are not cheap enough. They also provide a complete set of tools that are not always used. Sometimes, you need more segregated things, e.g., Signavio includes functionality for a company that has not yet matured. Since there are no basic packages, the company must pay for a package that is not fully used. Typically, process management is started in a company of a certain maturity."
"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."
"The product's pricing could be improved."
Bizagi is ranked 5th in Business Process Design with 78 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 57 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and Visual Paradigm, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and IBM BPM. See our Bizagi vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
