We performed a comparison between Bizagi and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."
"The API is pretty straightforward."
"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand."
"Great mapping feature that's easy to use."
"The most beneficial features of Bizagi for our business processes are its seamless connectivity between process elements and its ability to automate tasks and perform simulations."
"The visualizations and attachments provided by the product are valuable."
"In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable."
"With the appropriate governance framework, properly trained business analysts can be empowered to design and build business solutions themselves."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"How simple it is to create new solutions."
"The product is very stable."
"Bizagi allows for automation, but it's very complicated."
"In business process mapping, you have pools and dark pools. I don't see that Bizagi differentiates between a regular pool and a dark pool."
"I would like to see a facility for building a simple CRUD application. In Bizagi, you can use database modeling, diagrams, forms, etc., but in some circumstances I need CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) functionalities which are not there yet."
"It is difficult to drive ROI on types of processes involving complex business rules."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"Framework approach, which extends to reusability in tools, like Pega, for deployment management could be improved."
"Bizagi could be improved by more automation and machine learning. Now that I'm learning more about data analyzers, I'm realizing that many people have problems with data and how to understand them."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"For code version control, you need to use some external software."
"Technical support is an area where they can improve."
"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"It is quite expensive."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"Support is expensive."
"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bizagi is ranked 7th in Process Automation with 78 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 60 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with webMethods.io Integration, IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Bizagi vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.