We performed a comparison between BizFlow and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."
"Technical support is pleasant to work with and always available."
"I liked its robustness the most. It was a very robust platform in my experience. It seemed like a very stable and powerful tool for handling lots of concurrent users and hammering at the system."
"The most valuable features are the integration capabilities - BPM can connect with almost any legacy or advanced system."
"This solution has always been lacking in the user interface (UI), it needed to be improved a lot. However, from the acquisition of Spark UI, the UI is much better. Overall the solution is robust and has the ability to integrate with any product for complex workflows."
"IBM BPM is equipped with all the functionalities which are needed for building BPM enterprise-level applications."
"The designer feature, compared to other solutions is easy to use."
"We use it for automating certain processes which previously took a lot of time for agents to set up different products for customers. They would have to enter a lot of different systems. This has now mostly been automated."
"Our customers use the solution as a workflow platform to manage their processes."
"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."
"Could increase vulnerability and security patches to make it more robust."
"We have been experiencing bad performance and instability."
"There is room for improvement in the stability."
"The front end is not customised for a good user experience."
"IBM BPM needs to have a better and modified interface."
"It is not user-friendly."
"The business would like to use the product with a lot less IT and equipment involvement."
"They should incorporate an API gateway functionality within it to simplify integrations."
BizFlow is ranked 29th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. BizFlow is rated 8.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BizFlow writes "Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". BizFlow is most compared with , whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our BizFlow vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.