We performed a comparison between BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite and ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."We have one MDM that works with Windows, iOS, and Android."
"Remote Wipe and Autopilot is one of the best features."
"It's very informative when there is an error. It allows us to backtrace where the error is and resolve that ourselves. It's a bit of a Swiss Army penknife. We find that it fixes most issues."
"It is a very stable and scalable cloud-only solution."
"The many policies available in Microsoft Intune for managing our devices are valuable."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"The most valuable features are the ones that make sure that the deployment is of a standard operating system and the Zero Touch deployment, which is very useful. This allows users to have an out of box experience."
"The most important thing for me is the autopilot feature."
"Cylance, their newest antivirus product, is the most valuable feature for us so far."
"There is very high flexibility for different setups of single users, so it can give a single use many different device types with different enrollment types."
"Having access to our internet was extremely beneficial. We don't have that functionality now that we have switched to Microsoft Intune. It was definitely better with Blackberry."
"If a device is stolen, you have the power to remove all of the contents remotely. You can do this very quickly."
"Every version upgrade has been straightforward."
"Whenever we have issues, people rely on the ability to check messages promptly."
"It keeps things secure, it can remotely wipe the container and it's fairly easy to use."
"It has a good ease of use, and its intuitive."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"It's the granularity: 'Is your firewall on? Is BitLocker on?' It's not amazing granularity. But I've looked into other products, like Duo, and they're all similar."
"They need to add more group policies. Intune currently does not have many group policies that you can deploy. Its reporting, which is very limited at the moment, also needs improvement. It will be great if they can add report customization. Its stability needs to be improved. Sometimes, when you register a device in Intune, it doesn't show up instantly on the engine portal on the admin side. They need to provide better support for complicated issues. They also have a long turnaround time."
"There can be some added features, such as an improved dashboard. Any new feature that could be a benefit to our customers would be good."
"I would like the ability to install the agent on devices from suppliers, which would enable us to implement a zero-trust strategy for guest devices."
"The reporting and cost have room for improvement."
"Data leak prevention can be integrated into it. Currently, it does not have data leak prevention."
"Enhancements for managing MacOS more comprehensively would be beneficial."
"There are some issues using the solution with macOS and iOS, and it offers limited granular control with them. Intune works better on Windows and Android."
"It's too difficult to manage ourselves. We have to get a third-party in to do that. The fact that it breaks on some end-users' devices is also a concern and just the frequency and complexity of upgrades is not ideal."
"I'd like there to be more in the core product rather than having to buy additional products. For example, being able to trace your devices after an emergency is an additional product you have to buy to do that properly."
"The interface could be improved."
"More devices supported like iOS, Android, and API so it can support various platforms to enhance the experience."
"We cannot integrate BlackBerry Edit from BlackBerry Enterprise. BlackBerry Edit has issues when we are editing any document. We have other internal applications that we can use for documents, but we cannot edit into BlackBerry Edit. There's room for improvement with editing documents."
"The only thing is that the UEM service is a little slow. We have a product production environment, and a test environment and both of them are a little slow. When you are using the UEM Web interface, it takes time to load."
"From the past to the present, before mobility location, we frequently required a restart."
"Second level support needs to have strong knowledge of the product."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
More BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is ranked 17th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 24 reviews while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review. BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite writes "Helpful technical support, and performs well, but initial setup could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, SOTI MobiControl and Ivanti Neurons for MDM, whereas ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360, Google Endpoint Management, VMware Workspace ONE and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.