We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The most valuable features are script blocking and macros within Word documents for stopping unwanted applications from running in the background."
"It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating."
"It secures different entry points into the network."
"Specifically for a Windows domain environment, the product can be customized and pushed via GPO or SCCM without issue."
"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."
"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."
"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."
"Blackberry Protect offers endpoint protection. It's easy to deploy. It's scalable and stable."
"The product is quite user-friendly."
"We like the management of the ePO, and we like the management console."
"The product’s stability and security features enhance user protection and organizational security."
"The endpoint security, antivirus and firewall are the most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security."
"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."
"It's quite easy to install agents."
"The solution provides dashboard control, so we can centrally monitor the entire status of our organization."
"Some of McAfee Endpoint Security's main features are it has benefits over normal conventional antivirus solutions because it works much faster."
"The support needs improvement."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."
"They could improve on the false positives, reporting and whitelisting features."
"I'd like them to do software distribution too, but they said that that's architecturally not at the product line."
"The product needs to continue to offer better alerts. In particular, around false positives. It needs to reduce them from happening."
"The management console needs a little maturity in how it presents data and allows the administrator to drill down or search across systems."
"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."
"I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined."
"Work on the math model. We are catching a lot of false positives, which gets to be a pain at the start of a deployment."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"While we are pleased with the endpoint solution, there should also be a separate one for the firewall."
"The solution takes up a high amount of memory and can cause the system to hang."
"There is room to improve with scalability."
"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."
"The interface is complex."
"The price of the solution is high in Asia."
"They can improve its resource consumption, such as memory, and maybe provide better or smaller updates. It always takes a lot of resources, but it has been getting better. I have been using McAfee products for the last 20 years or so, and I know it is getting better."
CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Endpoint. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.