Compare Blackberry Protect vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Blackberry Protect vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program.""The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.""It doesn't impact the devices. It is an agent-based solution, and we see no performance knock on cell phones. That was a big thing for us, especially in the mobile world. We don't see battery degradation like you do with other solutions which really drain the battery, as they're constantly doing things. That can shorten the useful life of a device.""Integration is a key selling factor for Cisco security products. We have a Cisco Enterprise Agreement with access to Cisco Email Security, Cisco Firepower, Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Talos, Cisco Threat Grid, Cisco Umbrella, and also third-party solutions. This is key to our security and maximizing operations. Because we do have the Email Security appliance and it is integrated with Threat Response, we have everything tied together. Additionally, we are using the Cisco SecureX platform, as we were a beta test for that new solution. With SecureX, we are able to pull all those applications into one pane for visibility and maintenance. This greatly maximizes our security operations."

More Cisco Secure Endpoint Pros »

"On the management side, we liked the way it displays things.""The solution is extremely scalable. It's got the hybrid functionality, it's got the system functionality and cloud functionality as well.""The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features.""Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected.""Has good RAM capacity for the power I need""It secures different entry points into the network.""You can manage all the threats and everything from a centralized dashboard.""It provides good insight into the programs, applications, or websites that may need attention."

More Blackberry Protect Pros »

"Defender is integrated into the operating system. It's integrated with everything. You don't have to spend time analyzing what you have to do to be sure that the integration is okay between the security tool and all the other apps. This, from my point of view, is the main advantage.""The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and the updates are very simple.""The most valuable feature is that we can use the solution right out of the box without too much configuration.""Automatic scanning and cleaning of viruses is the best and most valuable feature helping this tool to thrive. If any viruses are found, they are cleaned automatically.""We have liked the fact that it comes with Microsoft Windows 10 and it is constantly updated with all new virus definitions. It is also updated with new security features on a regular basis.""It's absolutely free to use.""The fact that it's from Microsoft, you don't have many false positives, unlike products from other vendors might have.""The patch management is very easy, as it can be done automatically or added to a schedule."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pros »

Cons
"In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration.""The technical support is very slow.""I would recommend that the solution offer more availability in terms of the product portfolio and integration with third-party products.""Maybe there is room for improvement in some of the automated remediation. We have other tools in place that AMP feeds into that allow for that to happen, so I look at it as one seamless solution. But if you're buying AMP all by itself, I don't know if it can remove malicious software after the fact or if it requires the other tools that we use to do some of that."

More Cisco Secure Endpoint Cons »

"It should provide more details about the events that they have detected.""I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices.""The OPTICS component could be made more user-friendly with respect to giving people more information.""I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined.""It should have better support for Windows and Mac.""The user interface is outdated.""The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement.""The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."

More Blackberry Protect Cons »

"The solution needs to improve its ransomware. It's not so good. It could also use some general performance optimization for the computers the solution operates on, to ensure it does not slow down the devices.""I would like to be able to set up any kind of protection I want in the firewall, any IP address or any number.""There's scanning going on that occasionally topples the memory, causing everything to freeze. This should be fixed.""With increase of cyber threats and cybersecurity issues, I would recommend that the product be developed like an AI product with more features which can counter any threat in the coming eras.""There is no behavior analytics for devices and endpoints. There is no behavior-based protection.""The anti-ransomware features need to be improved upon.""I would like to have a dashboard that shows an overview of the results for the enterprise.""I would like to see better integration with their other security products to give better visibility from a higher level."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco Secure Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is.""The monthly fee is $55 USD per user.""The product cost is about $5, per user, per month.""This cost of the license is approximately $5 USD monthly per user.""It's not so heavily priced; rather, it's average and decent.""We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

More Blackberry Protect Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The product is free of charge and comes integrated into Windows.""The solution is free.""This product is included in the pricing for Windows.""If you don't purchase the advanced threat protection then there is no additional charge.""It is affordable and comes in the Office 365 bundle.""Microsoft Defender ATP is expensive.""I pay for it through the Windows Professional or Standard license. It is a one-time cost for me, and I use the same license.""When compared with other vendors, the pricing is very high."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection for Business (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is signature-based malware detection.
Top Answer: Licensing fees are on a yearly basis and I am happy with the pricing.
Top Answer: The GUI needs improvement, it's not good. There are false positives in emails. At times, the emails are blocked and… more »
Top Answer: A user can continue to add endpoints and the solution will continue to perform well.
Top Answer: I don't have any information in relation to the pricing or the licensing. it's not an aspect of the solution I deal… more »
Top Answer: Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's… more »
Top Answer: It depends on the licensing. Most of the customers have got at least a 365 E3 license, and they can use most of the… more »
Top Answer: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint comes with Windows 10, and it's free. But for you to be able to manage it in the cloud… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Microsoft Defender ATP, Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection, MS Defender for Endpoint, MS Defender for Endpoint, MS Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender Antivirus
Learn More
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

BlackBerry® Protect is an artificial intelligence (AI) based endpoint protection platform (EPP) that prevents breaches and provides added controls for safeguarding against sophisticated cyberthreats—no human intervention, Internet connections, signature files, heuristics or sandboxes required.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a complete endpoint security solution that delivers preventative protection, post-breach detection, automated investigation, and response. With Defender for Endpoint, you have: 

Agentless, cloud powered - No additional deployment or infrastructure. No delays or update compatibility issues. Always up to date. 

Unparalleled optics - Built on the industry’s deepest insight into Windows threats and shared signals across devices, identities, and information. 

Automated security - Take your security to a new level by going from alert to remediation in minutes—at scale. 

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security and Compliance Community.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Endpoint
Learn more about Blackberry Protect
Learn more about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank
Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit
Petrofrac, Metro CSG, Christus Health
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
Wholesaler/Distributor7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider26%
Computer Software Company22%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company25%
Financial Services Firm19%
Construction Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government6%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Computer Software Company14%
Healthcare Company11%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider24%
Computer Software Company23%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise54%
REVIEWERS
Small Business63%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise23%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise52%
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about Blackberry Protect vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Blackberry Protect is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection for Business (EPP) with 18 reviews while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Protection for Business (EPP) with 55 reviews. Blackberry Protect is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Blackberry Protect writes "An outstanding product that is pretty spot on and easy to deploy and use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Reduces admin overhead and allows us to define and roll out policies from a central console". Blackberry Protect is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne, Carbon Black CB Defense and McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec End-User Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Security, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and ZoneAlarm. See our Blackberry Protect vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection for Business (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection for Business (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.