We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and Webroot Business Endpoint Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"This is stable and scalable."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Blackberry Protect offers endpoint protection. It's easy to deploy. It's scalable and stable."
"A user can continue to add endpoints and the solution will continue to perform well."
"Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product."
"The solution is easy to deploy."
"The solution is pretty easy to scale."
"In most cases, the solution's ability to detect in the MITRE framework, and its ability to be able to detect attacks in any one of seven or eight different areas of the life cycle of an attack is very useful."
"Even if an endpoint loses connection to the Internet, I know that endpoint is protected against 99.99% of the threats in the wild today."
"Endpoints are protected in real-time without the need of a centralized server."
"It is very light. It is the only solution that can be installed on a machine that already has an antivirus. It is a pretty complete solution."
"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."
"I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution."
"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."
"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."
"Low performance requirements."
"Probably, compared to other antivirus programs, what we like about it is it is lightweight."
"Valuable features include good scanning, very light footprint and management console that the client can access and (just as important) in which I can see status of groups of computers (I am a consultant, IT role)."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined."
"Work on the math model. We are catching a lot of false positives, which gets to be a pain at the start of a deployment."
"It was not effective. There were a lot of false positives, even when we use Adobe, and everybody uses Adobe, which is not a threat."
"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."
"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."
"The management console needs a little maturity in how it presents data and allows the administrator to drill down or search across systems."
"The user interface is outdated."
"The OPTICS component could be made more user-friendly with respect to giving people more information."
"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."
"Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement."
"They should provide more information on the type of cyber attacks."
"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."
"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."
"It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information."
"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."
"Reporting system could be improved."
More Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
CylancePROTECT is ranked 28th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 37 reviews while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is ranked 35th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 30 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection writes "Lightweight and not hard to set up however, does not offer good reporting". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Huntress and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.