Compare BlackBerry Radar vs. eMaint CMMS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BlackBerry Radar Logo
91 views|7 comparisons
eMaint CMMS Logo
72 views|54 comparisons
Ranking
Views
91
Comparisons
7
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
72
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

The BlackBerry Radar family of products is an all-encompassing asset tracking solution that gives fleet assets such as trailers, vans, containers, flatbeds, chassis and equipment the intelligence to securely communicate in near real-time. The BlackBerry Radar solution includes:

  • An easy-to-install and low maintenance device.
  • Industry-specific web-based applications for powerful and intuitive business analytics.
  • Cellular connectivity and continuous product improvements via regular over-the-air software updates.

eMaint computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) software is an award-winning solution for managing work orders, PM schedules and parts inventory. A Fluke company, 50,000+ users worldwide rely on eMaint to predict failures, eliminate downtime and improve reliability.

Offer
Learn more about BlackBerry Radar
Learn more about eMaint CMMS
Sample Customers
Contract Transport Services, Titanium Transporation Group, Pana Pacific, Alom Equipment, Polaris Transporation Group, Matson Logistics
Inframark, Martinrea, Tencorr Packaging

BlackBerry Radar is ranked 17th in Enterprise Asset Management while eMaint CMMS is ranked 3rd in Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS). BlackBerry Radar is rated 0.0, while eMaint CMMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BlackBerry Radar is most compared with , whereas eMaint CMMS is most compared with AVEVA Avantis.PRO.

We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.