BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs BMC TrueSight Server Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Orchestration and BMC TrueSight Server Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I find the provisioning to be the most valuable.""The initial setup is easy. The deployment was done in an hour.""The automation helps in payment transactions through BHIM app. The BMC helps in smooth clearance of all payments without using MasterCard or Visa. The solution is ready to use, and there is no need for customization or resources. We can complete integration over cloud and on-premise, and even using mainframes. The automation are secure through BMC TrueSight Orchestration.""The best thing about TrueSight is the user interface, which is intuitive and easy to use. It supports accessibility and exporting, so we can output to the format we require. We can use TrueSight to integrate nearly any other product. I can't think of another product that can match this functionality. We also have Microsoft Orchestrator, but it can't match BMC TrueSight Orchestration.""We particularly like the integration functionality of this solution. This product is open API, which means that it can be integrated with any solution from any other brand.""This solution is scalable.""The best feature of BMC TrueSight Orchestration is the number of integrated mechanisms it provides.""The product has a very good triggering mechanism."

More BMC TrueSight Orchestration Pros →

"With BMC, we even configured applications, like IE or things that were Java-related. When we scheduled the jobs, it worked fine. It saved us time and there was no need for resources to monitor them.""The product's valuable feature is its ability to conduct patching for multiple servers simultaneously.""It makes deployment easier and allows us to put restrictions on the server using role-based authorization.""The best feature of the solution is patch automation.""As this solution provides strong support and has multiple use cases, it is worth the cost.""Server Automation's best feature is automated patching. It also helps us automate compliance and report generation. We can even integrate TrueSight Server Automation with a vulnerability management solution to remedy vulnerabilities by applying patches, deploying scripts, or changing registry entries.""BladeLogic lets users view the filesystem with minimal authorization to the server.""The ability to script and create BL packages to perform various functions. This makes automating our environment relatively easy to do."

More BMC TrueSight Server Automation Pros →

Cons
"Regarding scalability, the architecture does not allow you to add additional servers just able to use two application servers, so it's not scalable.""The solution is not user-friendly.""At present this solution is only available to be hosted on-premises, which can cause network issues when integration with cloud-based software is attempted.""BMC TrueSight Orchestration could improve by providing some visibility on how the workflows are progressing.""The solution should move to the cloud. Every application from the BMC is on the container and moving to the cloud. There is also a number of limitations for the smart reporting feature of the TrueSight server which is not working in sync. We did not get any satisfactory reply from BMC on that note. We are not able to do the real-time sync between HSA and non-HSA service reporting tools and the actual application tools.""We are aiming for AI automation and look for support from BMC. The features are currently missing but we are hoping for some upgrade in this matter.""It would be helpful if TrueSight could log errors in a better format. I would also like to see more connector support. Let's say I have a third-party vendor that I need to integrate with Ansible. It would be helpful if BMC announced a specific connector for that. I've encountered situations where I need to work with scripts or find another way to integrate a particular product with TrueSight Orchestration. BMC already supports many products. For example, we have a connector for Ansible, but I think it needs to be improved some.""The architecture of this solution needs improvement, it is very complicated. It creates a lot of problems in our environment. Most of the time I am trying to find and solve the problem."

More BMC TrueSight Orchestration Cons →

"Another area for improvement is group scheduling if I'm trying to do all the servers. For example, if I want to do all the 2012 Servers - since the patches are the same for all of them - I can't do so.""Resource management on the base servers is sluggish and could be improved.""Scaling the environment during setup at larger organizations with 10,000 employees gets complicated.""We've had to increase RAM and CPU processing in order to alleviate some of the sluggishness during patching.""We encountered some reporting issues. Also, we needed to gather information from the backend before the product execution. The output's format is not good.""I would like to see more container integration in the next release of this solution.""BMC TrueSight Server Automation's scripting needs improvement.""Without any knowledge of the product, we used the KB articles to start working. As a result, we definitely did not have full knowledge of BMC BladeLogic... They need to provide a minimum of knowledge with training on YouTube or somewhere else."

More BMC TrueSight Server Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing is per lot, or per agent — one agent is one license."
  • "There is a huge cost saving with BMC TrueSight compared to other solutions."
  • "Regarding pricing, it comes with the package when you buy the server automation. But it's made depending on some agreements for companies, of which I don't know the clause."
  • "Licensing is available in different ways and depends on data being consumed by users and nodes being operated."
  • More BMC TrueSight Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing is a bit pricey. Be mindful about the components that you need and buy as appropriate."
  • "We're looking at less than $100,000 USD for this solution."
  • "The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."
  • "The product's pricing depends on the number of servers."
  • "The product is expensive."
  • More BMC TrueSight Server Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The automation helps in payment transactions through BHIM app. The BMC helps in smooth clearance of all payments without using MasterCard or Visa. The solution is ready to use, and there is no need… more »
    Top Answer:We are aiming for AI automation and look for support from BMC. The features are currently missing but we are hoping for some upgrade in this matter.
    Top Answer:BMC TrueSight is majorly used for database backup and auto remediation for the networks. It is also used for server provisioning.
    Top Answer:The product's valuable feature is its ability to conduct patching for multiple servers simultaneously.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. However, they provide all the essential services, including quick support solutions.
    Top Answer:BMC TrueSight Server Automation's scripting needs improvement.
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    597
    Comparisons
    408
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    448
    Rating
    8.3
    12th
    Views
    2,245
    Comparisons
    1,589
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    488
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TrueSight Orchestration, Atrium Orchestrator
    TrueSight Server Automation, BladeLogic Server Automation, BladeLogic Automation Suite
    Learn More
    Overview

    IT process automation can significantly lower the cost of IT delivery and reduce the risk associated with manual interactions. BMC Atrium Orchestrator automates common, repeatable tasks to improve quality of service across the board.

    • Move from reactive, manual handling of requests to a fully automated system
    • Deliver consistent task and automation workflow results
    • Automate data collection for audit compliance
    • Align with best practices
    • Free up IT resources

    BladeLogic Server Automation allows you to quickly and securely provision, configure, patch, and maintain physical, virtual, and cloud servers. 

    ·         Threat remediation: Combine with BMC SecOps Response Service to link vulnerabilities to identified patches and create a remediation plan

    ·         Compliance: Integrates role-based access control, pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP, documentation, and remediation

    ·         Provisioning: Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning

    ·         Configuration: Consistently manage change and configuration activities across a broad range of server environments with one tool

    ·         Reporting: Assess change impact or complete an audit using multiple dashboard views

    ·         Patching: Supports and follows maintenance window guidelines to ensure timely delivery of patches

    Sample Customers
    Ameritas, Buckeye Partners, KNAB, Dex Media, News UK
    State of Michigan, Fujitsu FSAS, Transamerica Life Insurance Company, SAP
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government17%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government8%
    Wholesaler/Distributor7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BMC TrueSight Orchestration is ranked 15th in Process Automation with 9 reviews while BMC TrueSight Server Automation is ranked 12th in Configuration Management with 18 reviews. BMC TrueSight Orchestration is rated 8.0, while BMC TrueSight Server Automation is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Orchestration writes "An orchestration tool to automate the end-to-end process with a need to improve its user experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Server Automation writes "Easy to deploy, automatic patching, and scalable". BMC TrueSight Orchestration is most compared with Control-M, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ServiceNow Orchestration and CA Process Automation, whereas BMC TrueSight Server Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, BigFix, Red Hat Satellite and Microsoft Configuration Manager.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.