Compare BlazeMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing
 | Anonymous User Senior Test Engineer at a tech services company |
Use Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us.
Top Answer: The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan.
Top Answer: Having more options for customization would be helpful.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Views
5,723
Comparisons
4,136
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
261
Rating
7.5
Views
373
Comparisons
195
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
JMeter Cloud
LoadView Stress Testing
CA BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing CA BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
LoadView provides scalable external load testing using real browsers. Spin up virtual machines in the Amazon, Google or Rackspace clouds without having to manage cloud accounts.
Record scripts and run stress tests on demand.
Learn more at https://www.loadview-testing.com
Learn more about BlazeMeter
Learn more about Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing
DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub
Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government6%
No Data Available
Small Business64%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise29%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BlazeMeter is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is ranked 19th in Load Testing Tools. BlazeMeter is rated 7.6, while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Good support and documentation". On the other hand, BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Neotys NeoLoad, whereas Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is most compared with Apache JMeter and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of .
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.