We performed a comparison between BlazeMeter and LambdaTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."
"It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to run high loads and generate reports."
"It supports any number of features and has a lot of tutorials."
"Its most valuable features are its strong community support, user-friendly interface, and flexible capacity options."
"The product's initial setup phase was simple."
"With the help of the Mock Services, we are overcoming everything. Wherever we are facing issues, whether they will be long term or temporary, by implementing the Mock Services we can bypass the faulty components that are not needed for our particular testing."
"BlazeMeter's most valuable feature is its cloud-based platform for performance testing."
"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."
"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."
"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."
"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The reporting capabilities could be improved."
"Integration is one of the things lacking in BlazeMeter compared to some newer options."
"The tool fails to offer better parameterization to allow it to run the same script across different environments, making it a feature that needs a little improvement."
"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."
"From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet."
"For a new user of BlazeMeter, it might be difficult to understand it from a programming perspective."
"I believe that data management and test server virtualization are things that Perforce is working on, or should be working on."
"Integration with APM tools like Dynatrace or AppDynamics needs to be improved."
"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."
"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."
BlazeMeter is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 41 reviews while LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 18 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 8.2, while LambdaTest is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Reduced our test operating costs, provides quick feedback, and helps us understand how to build better test cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and Perfecto, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Perfecto and Tricentis Tosca. See our BlazeMeter vs. LambdaTest report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
