Compare BlazeMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time.""BlazeMeter has allowed us to simplify and speed up our load testing process.""I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick.""They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."

More BlazeMeter Pros »

"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations.""The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter.""This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market.""The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily.""Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly.""I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pros »

Cons
"My only complaint is about the technical support, where sometimes I found that they would not read into and understand the details of my question before answering it.""A possible improvement could be the integration with APM tools.""In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports.""Having more options for customization would be helpful."

More BlazeMeter Cons »

"While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product.""The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools.""The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved.""Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled.""The reporting has room for improvement.""It's not that popular on the cloud."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."

More BlazeMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money.""The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year.""They have a much more practical pricing model now."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, I would like it to have the ability to customize reports.
Top Answer: Our primary use case is to create processes for performance. I created a one time function and implemented it for 1,000 users.
Top Answer: The information that the reports provide is very valuable, it can tell you the number of users you have, how long it is taking for specific tasks, and how much memory you have.
Top Answer: We have license files. The license is paid by what they call man-days, which is calculated based on the number of users that are needed and by the number of days they are going to use it for. In the… more »
Top Answer: When you are looking at what areas of the product have room for improvement, it depends on the various clients that you have and when the new operating systems come out. It can get interesting. It… more »
Ranking
Views
5,707
Comparisons
4,116
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
261
Rating
8.5
Views
5,111
Comparisons
3,743
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
793
Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
JMeter CloudPerformance Center, Micro Focus Performance Center, HPE Performance Center
Learn
Broadcom
Micro Focus
Overview
CA BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery. The rapidly growing CA BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Micro Focus Performance Center is a global cross-enterprise performance testing tool which enables you to manage multiple, concurrent performance testing projects across different geographic locations without any need to travel between the locations. Performance Center administers all your internal performance testing needs. With Performance Center, you manage all aspects of large-scale performance testing projects, including resource allocation and scheduling, from a centralized location accessible through the Web. Performance Center helps streamline the testing process, reduce resource costs, and increase operating efficiency.

Offer
Learn more about BlazeMeter
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise
Sample Customers
DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHubHexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company18%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm10%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business64%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise29%
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise78%
Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BlazeMeter is ranked 6th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 8.6, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Enables us to monitor our application instances as well as our database to see where the bottlenecks are". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Tests the performance of our applications and has the ability to share the screen while you are running a test". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad and Akamai CloudTest, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter, LoadUI Pro and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. See our BlazeMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.