Compare BlazeMeter vs. Neotys NeoLoad
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time." "BlazeMeter has allowed us to simplify and speed up our load testing process." "I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick." "They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us." | "It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty." "NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution." "I like the scripting and parameterization features." "The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good." "The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad." "The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to." "Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good." |
Cons | |
"My only complaint is about the technical support, where sometimes I found that they would not read into and understand the details of my question before answering it." "A possible improvement could be the integration with APM tools." "In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports." "Having more options for customization would be helpful." | "NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications." "While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us." "I would like to see support for auto-correlations." "Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing." "Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols." "Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan." | "The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools." "Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. 456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick. Top Answer: In terms of improvement, I would like it to have the ability to customize reports. Top Answer: Our primary use case is to create processes for performance. I created a one time function and implemented it for 1,000 users. | Top Answer: The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad. Top Answer: Overall, we're quite satisfied with the product. Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is… more » Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for load testing. Our focus is not so much performance testing. We focus more on load testing, which does inadvertently include performance testing, however. |
Ranking  | |
Views 5,707 Comparisons 4,116 Reviews 6 Average Words per Review 261 Rating 8.5 | Views 7,293 Comparisons 3,960 Reviews 6 Average Words per Review 287 Rating 8.7 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 33% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. Compared 4% of the time. | Compared 28% of the time. Compared 21% of the time. Compared 6% of the time. Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| JMeter Cloud | NeoLoad |
Learn | |
| Broadcom | Neotys Video Not Available |
Overview | |
| CA BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery. The rapidly growing CA BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv. | The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests. |
Offer | |
Learn more about BlazeMeter | Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad |
Sample Customers | |
| DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub | Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company35% Comms Service Provider14% Financial Services Firm7% Media Company7% | Retailer19% Government19% Individual & Family Service13% Computer Software Company13% Computer Software Company42% Comms Service Provider12% Insurance Company7% Energy/Utilities Company5% |
Company Size | |
Small Business64% Midsize Enterprise7% Large Enterprise29% | Small Business6% Midsize Enterprise20% Large Enterprise74% |
Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BlazeMeter is ranked 6th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 8.6, while Neotys NeoLoad is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Enables us to monitor our application instances as well as our database to see where the bottlenecks are". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Easy to build test cases, good stability and good scalability". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Tricentis Flood and Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and RadView WebLOAD. See our BlazeMeter vs. Neotys NeoLoad report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.