Compare BlazeMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BlazeMeter Logo
5,746 views|4,175 comparisons
RadView WebLOAD Logo
1,737 views|1,042 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time.""BlazeMeter has allowed us to simplify and speed up our load testing process.""I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick.""They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."

More BlazeMeter Pros »

"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting.""The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

More RadView WebLOAD Pros »

Cons
"My only complaint is about the technical support, where sometimes I found that they would not read into and understand the details of my question before answering it.""A possible improvement could be the integration with APM tools.""In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports.""Having more options for customization would be helpful."

More BlazeMeter Cons »

"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved.""The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

More RadView WebLOAD Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."

More BlazeMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We purchased a license for two years.""It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."

More RadView WebLOAD Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, I would like it to have the ability to customize reports.
Top Answer: Our primary use case is to create processes for performance. I created a one time function and implemented it for 1,000 users.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
5,746
Comparisons
4,175
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
259
Avg. Rating
8.6
13th
Views
1,737
Comparisons
1,042
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
597
Avg. Rating
5.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
JMeter Cloud
Learn
Broadcom
Radview
Video Not Available
Overview
CA BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery. The rapidly growing CA BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

Offer
Learn more about BlazeMeter
Learn more about RadView WebLOAD
Sample Customers
DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider8%
Media Company8%
Government8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Healthcare Company29%
University14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company49%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider6%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BlazeMeter is ranked 6th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while RadView WebLOAD is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 8.6, while RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Enables us to monitor our application instances as well as our database to see where the bottlenecks are". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, LoadRunner Cloud, Neotys NeoLoad and LoadUI Pro, whereas RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, Visual Studio Test Professional and Selenium HQ. See our BlazeMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.