Compare BlazeMeter vs. Tricentis Flood

BlazeMeter is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Tricentis Flood is ranked 14th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review. BlazeMeter is rated 8.6, while Tricentis Flood is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Enables us to monitor our application instances as well as our database to see where the bottlenecks are". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Flood writes "Easy to maintain and the Java support is good, but the performance needs to be improved". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, LoadRunner Cloud and Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis Flood is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, Apache JMeter and LoadRunner Cloud.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BlazeMeter Logo
5,763 views|4,191 comparisons
Tricentis Flood Logo
867 views|678 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Tricentis Flood? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick.BlazeMeter has allowed us to simplify and speed up our load testing process.It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time.

More BlazeMeter Pros »

The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need.

More Tricentis Flood Pros »

Cons
In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports.A possible improvement could be the integration with APM tools.My only complaint is about the technical support, where sometimes I found that they would not read into and understand the details of my question before answering it.

More BlazeMeter Cons »

The performance of the tool needs to improve.

More Tricentis Flood Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,763
Comparisons
4,191
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
259
Avg. Rating
8.6
14th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
867
Comparisons
678
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
416
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
JMeter CloudFlood IO
Learn
Broadcom
Tricentis
Overview
CA BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery. The rapidly growing CA BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based, distributed load testing platform that helps teams test, analyze and improve the way their applications scale - with seamless integration across the DevOps pipeline. With Tricentis Flood, you can achieve a continuous view of application performance and go live with confidence.

Offer
Learn more about BlazeMeter
Learn more about Tricentis Flood
Sample Customers
DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHubNike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Comms Service Provider9%
Media Company8%
Government5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of .

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.