We performed a comparison between Blue Coat Incident Response, Analytics, and Forensics [EOL] and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection).More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Blue Coat Incident Response, Analytics, and Forensics [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews. Blue Coat Incident Response, Analytics, and Forensics [EOL] is rated 0.0, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". Blue Coat Incident Response, Analytics, and Forensics [EOL] is most compared with , whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard.
We monitor all ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.