BlueTalon [EOL] vs Informatica Persistent Data Masking comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BlueTalon [EOL] and Informatica Persistent Data Masking based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Database Development and Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information.
Top Answer:I think there's only one area that could be improved. Currently, when we apply the Data Masking rate, we don't have a way to view the masked data. It would be helpful if there was a feature to allow… more »
Top Answer:Test data management is a common use case. When conducting testing in lower environments, we want to avoid exposing sensitive information. To achieve this, we use Data Masking to modify the data. For… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Database Development and Management
6th
out of 31 in Data Masking
Views
303
Comparisons
179
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
544
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Data Masking, Informatica Data Masking
Learn More
Microsoft
Video Not Available
Overview

As your organization collects more and more data to support the business, you need to explicitly define the scope of access that users should have to that data. Too little control exposes the business to unnecessary risks yet too much limits the benefits realized from the deployments of big data environments. You need the ability to dynamically control data with the greatest level of granularity based on users’ roles and business needs.

De-identify, de-sensitize, and anonymize sensitive data from unauthorized access for application users, business intelligence, application testing, and outsourcing.

Sample Customers
Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, Cloudera, MapR
Vale, Hot Telecommunication, UPMC
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Computer Software Company13%
Government7%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Database Development and Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BlueTalon [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Database Development and Management while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is ranked 6th in Data Masking with 5 reviews. BlueTalon [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Persistent Data Masking writes "Enables secure data protection during testing and controlled access to sensitive information". BlueTalon [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Informatica Persistent Data Masking is most compared with Delphix, Protegrity Data Security, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, IBM InfoSphere Optim and Imperva SecureSphere Database Security.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.