BMC Client Management vs Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Client Management and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Kandji and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM).
To learn more, read our detailed Mobile Device Management (MDM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One feature I like, that was especially valuable during the pandemic, is remote control. Remote control grants administrators and support personnel access to the laptops and PCs of employees (who might be working from home) in order to fix any issues that come up as and when they come up, even without having to wait for a support request.""The most valuable features of the solution are its patching capabilities and the help it offers when it comes to use cases, like prompting for the reboot after a certain period of time.""The most valuable features of the solution are patch management and software license management.""It's a scalable solution. We have deployed it for customers using 3000 nodes to those using 300,000 nodes.""The support from BMC Client Management is very good.""The inventory and patch management tools are very valuable."

More BMC Client Management Pros →

"The product provides a universal dashboard.""The most valuable features include remote inventory analysis, security features like geofencing, and software distribution.""It's a very easy solution for the most part, it's very easy to implement and very easy to administer.""We experience no downtime, no breakdowns, all the user readings are exact, and it gives us quick analysis so we can apply security measures.""The most valuable features of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) are its ability to do geofencing for devices, manage thousands of devices with only a push of a button, and quick application deployment in seconds. It's amazing. For example, in an education scenario, you can deploy an application update for thousands of iPads in two clicks.""The cloud manager is user-friendly, and I can manage everything from one dashboard.""It's very easy to just keep adding devices as needed.""The most significant benefit is that the deployment is quick and painless. You don't need a specialized IT department to implement and scale the network. It's easy to maintain, too. It only requires one or two network administrators."

More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pros →

Cons
"BMC Client Management supports only iOS devices. It would be good if they would support Android as well.""It would be good if BMC Client Management can perform vulnerability assessment scanning at the endpoint on its own and mitigate that. Then, we wouldn't have to rely on a third party VA tool. I would like to see this application move to being a web-based one.""BMC Client Management could improve in the area of integration.""The solution needs to add whitelisting because many customers request it.""The on-premises version of BMC Client Management has powerful remote control functionality and decent compliance features, but these features both rely on the discovery tool in order to gain a complete set of insights about the endpoint's environment. Now, BMC's discovery solution depends on having an agent installed in each endpoint and sometimes the agent doesn't work properly, making it difficult to get an accurate understanding of the environment (including special topologies) even with BMC's discovery tool.""The solution does not offer the functionality of remote access to users."

More BMC Client Management Cons →

"Because Cisco has improved a lot and is competing with other technologies that are innovative and brand new to the market, the only improvements they have to make are to keep up with the current competition and remain competitive with other solutions.""The tool's pricing needs to be more flexible like Cisco's.""Security could be improved, and there could be more features that enable you to customize the end customer solution.""Linux compatibility needs improvement.""The solution can be expensive.""They need to allocate more energy in terms of their offering to devices that are not Apple devices.""Meraki is limiting our connections.""It doesn't seem to be able to establish some VPN tunnels with other devices in a particular way that such as an ASA can do for us."

More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is low cost."
  • "To use BMC Client Management they charge annually per node."
  • "BMC Client Management is a very affordable solution. There is one main server license which I believe is around $1,000 per year, and then there is the license for the actual solution. With the solution license, you can opt for a suite license where you get access to all the features and benefits, or alternatively you can buy any of the five main components of the suite license individually."
  • More BMC Client Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price is high for the market."
  • "It's extremely competitive and very good for a product in this sphere."
  • "The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive."
  • "This product is reasonably priced."
  • "My customers at times have issues with the price of the solution. It is expensive, but overall it is worth it. The licensing model cost is based on how many devices you require."
  • "The storage is affordable and the system has some price-related issues. Therefore, keeping the price in mind, I would rate it seven out of ten."
  • "Meraki MDM is the cheapest solution we have used."
  • "My clients find it a bit expensive compared to other systems."
  • More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Device Management (MDM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the solution are its patching capabilities and the help it offers when it comes to use cases, like prompting for the reboot after a certain period of time.
    Top Answer:Right now, I don't have anything to say about which areas in BMC Client Management need improvement. The solution does not offer the functionality of remote access to users. From an improvement… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    78
    Comparisons
    56
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    326
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    4,488
    Comparisons
    3,145
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    355
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    BMC Helix Client Management, Helix Client Management, BMC Fromdistance Mobile Device Management
    Meraki MDM
    Learn More
    Overview

    Client Management automates endpoint management and helps organizations control costs, maintain compliance, and reduce risk. From device acquisition to disposal, Client Management provides an accurate view of hardware installations, ensures device adherence to organizational and industry policies, and supports systems and software currency.

    Every user is unique. Every device, a bit different. Systems Manager keeps the network in the loop about constantly changing devices, automatically tracking device posture and adjusting security policies to match.

    Sample Customers
    Charter Manufacturing
    Hafen Hamburg & Empire Riverside Hotel, Eastview Church, Tourism Holdings, Colegio Sagrada Familia Hijas de Jesús, Tommy Bahama's, Canadian School Mexico, Rosebank College
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Transportation Company12%
    Hospitality Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization46%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government5%
    Construction Company4%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise53%
    Large Enterprise31%
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile Device Management (MDM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Kandji and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM). Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BMC Client Management is ranked 5th in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 6 reviews while Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 26 reviews. BMC Client Management is rated 8.6, while Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BMC Client Management writes "Efficient remote control capabilities; compliance features greatly reduced customers' licensing costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". BMC Client Management is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Microsoft Intune, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix and VMware Workspace ONE, whereas Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, IBM MaaS360 and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.

    We monitor all Mobile Device Management (MDM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.