BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and OpenText Cloud Service Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views.""By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate.""Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning.""Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation.""CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports.""Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system.""You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Pros →

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management.""The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pros →

Cons
"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment.""One of the major problems is that support is not so good.""The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Cons →

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester.""OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."
  • More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management.
    Top Answer:OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.
    Top Answer:My organization uses the enterprise server solution, Micro Focus, on Azure. We are working on a project to migrate a mainframe code to the micro-enterprise developer on Azure, submitting our JCL jobs… more »
    Ranking
    42nd
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    289
    Comparisons
    196
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    27th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    280
    Comparisons
    206
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    BMC CLM
    Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation
    Learn More
    Overview
    BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

    OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

    Sample Customers
    JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro
    China Merchants Bank, Osiatis
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government9%
    Legal Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is ranked 42nd in Cloud Management while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is ranked 27th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is rated 7.8, while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management writes "Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Service Automation writes "Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation ". BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is most compared with CloudBolt, whereas OpenText Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and VMware Aria Automation.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.