• Home
  • BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] vs. Correlsense SharePath

BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] vs Correlsense SharePath comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] and Correlsense SharePath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
All in all it's a pretty great tool
Anonymous User
It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications.
* It provides customer insight and behaviour. * It's improved our alerting, monitoring and reporting. * It proactively identifies problems.
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
84th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
139
Comparisons
108
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
End User Experience Management, EUEM, Coradiant
SharePath
Learn More
BMC
Correlsense
Overview
End User Performance Management tools deliver on the promise of detection, isolation, and remediation of both applications and infrastructure issues. This user-centric approach delivers deep insight for better, faster decision-making, reduced manual effort for IT staff, and more satisfied business users.
SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.
Sample Customers
AtTask
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Correlsense SharePath is ranked 84th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Correlsense SharePath is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] writes "All in all it's a pretty great tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Correlsense SharePath writes "It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications". BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Correlsense SharePath is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.