BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] vs JenniferSoft comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] and JenniferSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
MinLee
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The dashboard is a valuable feature.
Top Answer:The solution is pricy and has room for improvement.
Top Answer:I use JenniferSoft to monitor the performance and transaction traces of our applications.
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
254
Comparisons
174
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
216
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
End User Experience Management, EUEM, Coradiant
Learn More
Overview
End User Performance Management tools deliver on the promise of detection, isolation, and remediation of both applications and infrastructure issues. This user-centric approach delivers deep insight for better, faster decision-making, reduced manual effort for IT staff, and more satisfied business users.

JenniferSoft Application Performance Management (APM) is a system management methodology that focuses on monitoring and managing application software performance and service utilization. Also, it is a tool that helps system availability and stable operation by monitoring and analyzing performance of operating systems. JENNIFER provides comprehensive and integrated performance monitoring through its many dashboard views, which include Real-user Monitoring and Real-time Topology. JENNIFER analyzes statistical data regarding system resources, application performance and errors with a view to achieving continuous and optimal service availability. JENNIFER's continuous monitoring helps with rapid detection and troubleshooting of performance problems. That can help prevent the problems from affecting service availability later. And minimizing system downtime and improving overall performance at the application and system levels greatly improves customer satisfaction.

Sample Customers
AtTask
Standard Charter, SAS, SK, Mini Stop, AIG, SMBC, Prudential, Samsung, 3M, Meritz, LG, CJ, Pasco, Metr Asia Capital
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while JenniferSoft is ranked 50th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while JenniferSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] writes "All in all it's a pretty great tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas JenniferSoft is most compared with Grafana.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.