BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] vs Mackerel comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] and Mackerel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use Mackerel?
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
159
Comparisons
135
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
End User Experience Management, EUEM, Coradiant
Learn More
Mackerel
Video Not Available
Overview
End User Performance Management tools deliver on the promise of detection, isolation, and remediation of both applications and infrastructure issues. This user-centric approach delivers deep insight for better, faster decision-making, reduced manual effort for IT staff, and more satisfied business users.
Mackerel is an elegantly simple and powerful service that employs the concept of "roles" to optimize management and monitoring of hosts. By running mackerel-agent on your hosts, you can manage any number of hosts using both Mackerel's web GUI and API to visualize the statuses of your hosts and applications with a high degree of detail and customization.
Sample Customers
AtTask
M.T.Burn Inc., Nulab Inc., Nintendo, Livesense, Seesaa, Retty, Gyazo, Hatena, GMO, Kaizen Platform, Prott
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Mackerel is ranked 76th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Mackerel is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] writes "All in all it's a pretty great tool". On the other hand, BMC End User Experience Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Mackerel is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.