Compare BMC FootPrints Service Core vs. SCSM

BMC FootPrints Service Core is ranked 6th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 7 reviews while SCSM is ranked 7th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 7 reviews. BMC FootPrints Service Core is rated 8.4, while SCSM is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of BMC FootPrints Service Core writes "The primary value for us are the incident, problem, and change management features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCSM writes "Good flexibility and integration abilities but the interface needs improvement ". BMC FootPrints Service Core is most compared with ServiceNow, BMC Helix ITSM and JIRA Service Desk, whereas SCSM is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and JIRA Service Desk. See our BMC FootPrints Service Core vs. SCSM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC FootPrints Service Core vs. SCSM and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
XFlow (Temperature) and Service Point together provided an extremely user-friendly and collaborative experience to the point of making it easy for all users of the product, whether end-users or analysts.The most valuable features of this solution are reporting, configuration monitoring, and the Request and Incidents workflow.It has all our configurations. All our infrastructure configurations are on a single pane of glass to view, allowing for one single point of information.It helps when you have an incident or performing a problem change management process.We can search open and closed cases to find what we have done in other incidents.Being able to specify event rules and SLAs that can help to automate some of the processes that people are doing manually is valuable.The fact that it aligns very well with ITIL. I think that's probably one of my favorite things about it, because it's following up a general best practice for service management.the ticket system makes sure that everyone gets taken care of, and that makes for a better customer experience. Using the system verifies that no one gets left behind.

Read more »

This product solidly handles incident management, problem management, and change management.The discovery feature is very flexible.It has helped the help desk team. We get our tickets in and are able to support our customers, the end-users, with this solution.I think the most important feature is the ability to receive valuable ticket status support in a timely manner with little to no downtime interruptions.Implemented system-wide process for approving and tracking "employee move" requests for over 15,000 employees.‚ÄčAbility to auto-generate email messages, process email messages, and approvals.We have found the reports and the lockdown on a ticket valuable, so only one person can update issues.We can track issues easier and run reports on issues to see if there are patterns.

Read more »

A very convenient package like an all-in-one tool but it is actually five or six products acting well together.The solution is quite easy to integrate with other Microsoft products.The call logging is the solution's most valuable feature. It's very easy to use.This solution is easy to use.The remote access is one of the features I really enjoy. The pushing of email updates and things like that are very good.This product has helped our organization by allowing people to connect with each other.

Read more »

Cons
Diversifying notification methods with pop-ups or ready-made WhatsApp or Skype integration packages would be welcome.The monitoring tool is in need of improvement.The interface for the users is a bit old-fashioned and not user-friendly.We would like the CMDB to be populated automatically. At the moment, everything is manually created.We would like more information about all the configurations that we have on our infrastructure side.Needs custom dashboards, without them it takes too long to view some information (though xFlow is an improvement).I would also like to see a simpler reporting tool. They went from one fairly robust, very complex, reporting tool - it was great - and then they went to another one that was also fairly complex and robust. That's a great tool for people who are report writers, but for the average person who just wants to get a quick little report, it's like handing somebody a chainsaw because they have to break some toothpicks in half.The interface is pretty straightforward, but I think for some end-users a little more simplified user interface would help.

Read more »

The pricing could be a little lower and the product should cover more iTel versions.The mobile version of this product does not support asset management.The workflow should be made to be more user-friendly. It should also have more granular scalability.We need more customizable reporting functionality. We could also use more collaboration of service desk tickets. This will allow for two departments to share the same information, track the progress of the total task scope no matter how complex the request is.It would be nice if they added the ability to go directly to a form via a deep link URL.Reporting could be improved along with the option to create more fine tuned reports and to create specific fields for each type of ticket.Hyphens are not allowed in the quick search bar. This has created a problem in our environment where we use hyphens in our asset names.

Read more »

Resources for understanding compliance and relative compliance need to be made available.It's not too hard to compile stuff but it is hard to manage the solution. Even the design itself makes it difficult for management.The patch management aspect of the solution should be improved. It's quite complicated and not user-friendly. If your systems are not patched properly, you are unable to pull reports.Mobile application integration would be an improvement.It crashes our client's computers. Sometimes they get blue screens. It would be useful if SCSM could check the upgrades or patches before we implemented them to see if they are going to crash a client's system. Or, if it does install, and the client's system crashes, it would be good if the solution could revert back somehow.The price of this solution is high and it needs to be cheaper.Once we had an issue with a desktop download that would not open.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The licensing for FootPrints is a perpetual license with an annual support fee.This solution has good pricing.Our costs are well over $250,000.Cost was on par with other service desk products, and well below Remedy, while still being a BMC product.

Read more »

Licensing can be complex and confusing.It is an expensive solution.It is a lower price vs. other things on the market.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 46% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
Unicenter Service Desk, CA SDM, CA Service Catalog, CA Business Service InsightFootPrints Service CoreSystem Center Service Manager
Learn
CA (A Broadcom Company)
BMC
Microsoft
Overview

Service desk capabilities, an integral part of the CA Service Management solution, can enable you to deliver efficiencies in IT service management to business consumers, power users and decision makers. Mobility and collaborative self-service capabilities provide a modern user experience for accessing services and performing tasks, which can help drive user adoption, satisfaction and productivity.

Learn More: https://www.ca.com/us/products...

FootPrints Service Core integrates IT service and asset management for end-to-end business services, and it's easy to install, use, and support. With configurable capabilities that streamline service delivery, FootPrints improves customer satisfaction and IT's reputation with your business users.System Center Service Manager is a software product by Microsoft to allow organizations to manage incidents and problems. Microsoft states that the product is compliant with industry best practices such as the Microsoft Operations Framework (MOF) and in the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL). SCSM has integrated ITIL compliant fulfillment of service requests. Service requests are submitted by the end user in order to obtain information, access to a new application or the most common of all, password reset.
Offer
Learn more about CA Service Desk Manager
Learn more about BMC FootPrints Service Core
Learn more about SCSM
Sample Customers
Banco G&T Continental City of Perth, FEMSA, Fujitsu, Manpower, Muslim Commercial Bank - MCB, Punjab National Bank, Santa Clara County Social Services, StefaniniCast & CrewFibabanka, UMC Health System
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company29%
Financial Services Firm20%
Government8%
Transportation Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Insurance Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC FootPrints Service Core vs. SCSM and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email