BMC Release Lifecycle Management vs CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Release Lifecycle Management and CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
274
Comparisons
190
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Release Automation
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Varalogix, BMC RLM
Elastic Server
Learn More
Overview

Software release management doesn’t have to be difficult when you choose the right release management tools. As the volume, frequency, and complexity of your applications grow, so does the risk with each application release. With BMC Release Lifecycle Management you can mitigate risk and meet demand by enabling your DevOps team to automate and coordinate application release processes across the development and deployment lifecycle.

  • Deploy app changes faster with greater visibility and streamlined processes.
  • Lower costs by reducing downtime and increasing productivity.
  • Reduce errors with customized templates, improved collaboration, and automated deployment.
  • Remediate failed release steps during the application release automation process.

Elastic Server simplifies the process of creating application stacks for use on EC2 and other virtual environments. Instead of the painstaking manual downloading, configuration, building, and installation that is otherwise required when creating a complex stack, Elastic Server provides a menu-driven selection and build process.

Sample Customers
BMC Software, Sanofi, Societe Generale Group
Geezeo, PayNearMe, AngelEye Camera Systems, CodeObjects, Imagination, MTech Communications, Quantum Retail, Trek10, Foley Carrier Services
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Release Lifecycle Management is ranked 18th in Release Automation while CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation. BMC Release Lifecycle Management is rated 0.0, while CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BMC Release Lifecycle Management is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.