BMC Release Lifecycle Management vs Symantec Server Management Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Release Lifecycle Management and Symantec Server Management Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
274
Comparisons
190
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
31st
out of 42 in Server Monitoring
Views
78
Comparisons
67
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Varalogix, BMC RLM
Symantec Altirs Server Management Suite
Learn More
Overview

Software release management doesn’t have to be difficult when you choose the right release management tools. As the volume, frequency, and complexity of your applications grow, so does the risk with each application release. With BMC Release Lifecycle Management you can mitigate risk and meet demand by enabling your DevOps team to automate and coordinate application release processes across the development and deployment lifecycle.

  • Deploy app changes faster with greater visibility and streamlined processes.
  • Lower costs by reducing downtime and increasing productivity.
  • Reduce errors with customized templates, improved collaboration, and automated deployment.
  • Remediate failed release steps during the application release automation process.

Symantec Server Management Suite provides IT administrators with a comprehensive solution for managing physical and virtual servers across a broad array of platforms. The suite provides solutions to provision, control, automate, and monitor servers from a central console. With these tools, organizations gain and maintain control of their servers, reduce service interruptions, and increase uptime. With Server Management Suite, organizations are able to:

  • Manage change with confidence by driving predictable and repeatable day-to-day operations.
  • Make smarter, faster decisions with real-time conclusions that are data-driven.
  • Drive innovation through the adoption of new technologies and implementation of automated processes without adding new tools, people, or methodologies.
Sample Customers
BMC Software, Sanofi, Societe Generale Group
Amway (China) Co. Ltd., Barnabas Health, Cabela's Inc., College of Science, Technology, and Applied Arts of Trinidad and Tobago (COSTAATT), Comparex, DHL Hub Leipzig GmbH, GaVI GmbH, Helvetia Versicherungen, Kwizda Holdings GmbH, NASDAQ OMX Group Inc., Ningbo Municipal Yinzhou District No.2 Hospital, Shanghai Pudong International Container Terminals Co. Ltd., Travelport, University of Oxford
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Release Lifecycle Management is ranked 18th in Release Automation while Symantec Server Management Suite is ranked 31st in Server Monitoring. BMC Release Lifecycle Management is rated 0.0, while Symantec Server Management Suite is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BMC Release Lifecycle Management is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas Symantec Server Management Suite is most compared with MidVision RapidDeploy.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.