BMC Release Process Management [EOL] vs OpenText Deployment Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Release Process Management [EOL] and OpenText Deployment Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Release Automation
23rd
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
116
Comparisons
58
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Streamstep, BMC RPM
Micro Focus Deployment Automation, Serena Deployment Automation
Learn More
Overview

Release management processes ensure the sound deployment of changes to your business-critical applications. BMC Release Process Management helps you deploy more frequently, at lower cost, and with fewer errors. With lightweight, web-based task coordination and execution, your teams will be more productive than ever.

  • Accelerate deployments by reducing release cycles from weeks to hours.
  • Increase business agility by quickly responding to changing market conditions and competitive threats.
  • Ensure worry-free deployments by leveraging strong collaboration across teams.
  • Reduce costs by eliminating labor-intensive manual and script-based processes.

Deployment Automation enables repeatable, reliable and audit-compliant processes to simplify application deployments, reduce risk and increase the velocity of delivery across all environments of your delivery pipeline. It seamlessly enables deployment pipeline automation, reducing cycle times and providing rapid feedback on build deployments and releases into production. Reusable deployment templates allow reuse of processes and properties, simplifying the setup of new deployment processes. Supporting continuous integration and continuous deployments, Deployment Automation bridges the DevOps divide by simplifying and automating handoffs and deployments across development and operations teams. More information here.

Sample Customers
Ameritas, ChipRewards, MetaScale
GuideStone, TIAA CREF, EatonVance, Gordmans, D&B, Walkers,, Citi, Department of Health and Human Services USA, UBS, DTCC, Bp, Aflc, Ameritrade, Credit Agricole, Telecom Italia, GreatAmerican, Safeway, Allianz, Groupama, Generali Group.
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Release Process Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation while OpenText Deployment Automation is ranked 23rd in Release Automation. BMC Release Process Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Deployment Automation is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BMC Release Process Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Deployment Automation is most compared with .

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.