BMC Release Process Management [EOL] vs CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Release Process Management [EOL] and CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Release Automation
Unranked
In Release Automation
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Streamstep, BMC RPM
Elastic Server
Learn More
Overview

Release management processes ensure the sound deployment of changes to your business-critical applications. BMC Release Process Management helps you deploy more frequently, at lower cost, and with fewer errors. With lightweight, web-based task coordination and execution, your teams will be more productive than ever.

  • Accelerate deployments by reducing release cycles from weeks to hours.
  • Increase business agility by quickly responding to changing market conditions and competitive threats.
  • Ensure worry-free deployments by leveraging strong collaboration across teams.
  • Reduce costs by eliminating labor-intensive manual and script-based processes.

Elastic Server simplifies the process of creating application stacks for use on EC2 and other virtual environments. Instead of the painstaking manual downloading, configuration, building, and installation that is otherwise required when creating a complex stack, Elastic Server provides a menu-driven selection and build process.

Sample Customers
Ameritas, ChipRewards, MetaScale
Geezeo, PayNearMe, AngelEye Camera Systems, CodeObjects, Imagination, MTech Communications, Quantum Retail, Trek10, Foley Carrier Services
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Release Process Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation while CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation. BMC Release Process Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BMC Release Process Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.