BMC Release Process Management [EOL] vs SAS rPath [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Release Process Management [EOL] and SAS rPath [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Release Automation
Unranked
In Release Automation
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Streamstep, BMC RPM
rPath
Learn More
Overview

Release management processes ensure the sound deployment of changes to your business-critical applications. BMC Release Process Management helps you deploy more frequently, at lower cost, and with fewer errors. With lightweight, web-based task coordination and execution, your teams will be more productive than ever.

  • Accelerate deployments by reducing release cycles from weeks to hours.
  • Increase business agility by quickly responding to changing market conditions and competitive threats.
  • Ensure worry-free deployments by leveraging strong collaboration across teams.
  • Reduce costs by eliminating labor-intensive manual and script-based processes.
rPath is specialized in automating the assembly, provisioning and updating of diverse operating systems and middleware platforms and application stacks throughout enterprises.
Sample Customers
Ameritas, ChipRewards, MetaScale
Kaiser Permanente, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County DPSS, Lotte.com Nantes University Hospital Center, National Bank of Greece, National Board of Social Services
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Release Process Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation while SAS rPath [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation. BMC Release Process Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while SAS rPath [EOL] is rated 5.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS rPath [EOL] writes "Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake". BMC Release Process Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SAS rPath [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.