• Home
  • BMC TrueSight App Visibility Manager [EOL] vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

BMC TrueSight App Visibility Manager [EOL] vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight App Visibility Manager [EOL] and OpenText Real User Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Sid Roy
It has the ability to provide run-time production problem resolution, but while the instrumentation is powerful, it...
Provided rapid ability to triage and diagnose customer production environments- exercises that normally would take weeks could be accomplished in... Read more →
Yasir Amin
The reports and metrics we collect help us to improve our services
Real User Monitor has improved our productivity.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."
  • "If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"
  • "Not expensive."

    • More OpenText Real User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
    Top Answer:Real User Monitor has improved our productivity.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
    Top Answer:Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
    Top Answer:We use Real User Monitor to monitor services and capture problems from a user perspective, such as availability issues. The reports and metrics we collect from Real User Monitor help us to improve our… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    45th
    out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Views
    707
    Comparisons
    526
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    430
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Appsight
    Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM, MF RUM
    Learn More
    BMC
    OpenText
    Overview
    The AppSight Application Problem Resolution system automates problem resolution processes during the testing and maintenance phases of the application lifecycle. When a problem occurs, the BMC AppSight Black Box captures the synchronized problem history in a log that can be communicated to the entire problem resolution team, much like a black box flight recorder in an aircraft. BMC AppSight Black Box operates with an extremely low performance impact and requires no modifications to the application or system. With the black box log, those involved in problem triage and resolution can replay, rather than recreate, any reported problems, eliminating up to 70 percent of the cycle time typically consumed by root cause analysis.

    Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

    Sample Customers
    Danske Bank, Cox Communications, Cerner Corp
    Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Government9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BMC TrueSight App Visibility Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Real User Monitoring is ranked 45th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 8 reviews. BMC TrueSight App Visibility Manager [EOL] is rated 5.0, while OpenText Real User Monitoring is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight App Visibility Manager [EOL] writes "It has the ability to provide run-time production problem resolution, but while the instrumentation is powerful, it can overwhelm the system and cause instability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Real User Monitoring writes "The reports and metrics we collect help us to improve our services". BMC TrueSight App Visibility Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Real User Monitoring is most compared with AppDynamics, Dynatrace, Honeycomb.io and VMware Aria Operations for Applications.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.