We performed a comparison between Elastic Observability and BMC TrueSight Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Based on user feedback, Elastic Observability emerges as the preferred choice over BMC TrueSight Operations Management. Elastic Observability is commended for its cost-effectiveness, licensing advantages, and extensive range of features, including machine learning capabilities. Users find it easy to deploy and customize. Overall, organizations have experienced positive outcomes and cost savings with Elastic Observability.
"I believe that the ease of use and UI is great"
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management is easily scalable."
"The fact that they have a very integrated relationship with Sentry Software, the Knowledge Module, is valuable... The richest feature for us is the number of Knowledge Modules that we can load into the product to add breadth of service to the customer. It enables us to move up the operational stack from hardware, to operating system, to application, and to cloud... That enables us to provide one pane of glass over all those layers - hardware, OS, app, and cloud."
"I like the event management part."
"From an administrative standpoint, what stands out in TrueSight is the ability to implement quickly. When they have a requirement to monitor something, we're able to turn that on quickly in their environment. We're able to set up new apps within a day."
"The tailoring of the knowledge modules has been particularly useful as I can streamline the agents to only report on critical events."
"The major advantage of the product is estate management."
"The event management tool builds correlation logic and protection algorithms into a field of events that is valuable when a data center goes down."
"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."
"The product has connectors to many services."
"We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical."
"The Elastic User Interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. You need to have some Javascript knowledge. We need that knowledge to develop new custom tests."
"We can view and connect different sources to the dashboard using it."
"The solution has been stable in our usage."
"The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions."
"The solution allows us to dig deep into data."
"The UI for the end users could be improved and more flexible than it is now."
"The sizing (which is difficult), the maintenance of it and the upgrade paths. This is a difficult area which is not easy to cover, as every client has a different approach of implementing the product."
"The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large."
"Application performance management (APM) is an area with certain shortcomings in the solution that needs improvement. I"
"It's too complex, too many servers are required, there are too many different components in the solution, and a lot of agents are required."
"The product must provide more AI capabilities."
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management could improve the reporting."
"The graphs are extremely limited. We don't have a lot of dashboard options. To make reports and dashboards more useful, we usually need to integrate some dashboard solutions."
"The solution would be better if it was capable of more automation, especially in a monitoring capacity or for the response to abnormalities."
"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."
"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."
"More web features could be added to the product."
"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."
"Elastic Observability is reactive rather than proactive. It should act as an ITSM tool and be able to create tickets and alerts on Jira."
"The cost must be made more transparent."
"In the future, Elastic APM needs a portfolio iTool. They can provide an easy way to develop the custom UI for Kibana."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 48 reviews while Elastic Observability is ranked 7th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 22 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Elastic Observability is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Observability writes "The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. ". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, New Relic and Zabbix, whereas Elastic Observability is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics, Datadog and Sentry. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Elastic Observability report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.