Compare BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. JenniferSoft

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The only possible additional cost that I can mention, that you might not be aware of, is that it uses Oracle partitioning, if you use Oracle. There are Oracle partitioning fees that go with that.""We're end-of-lifeing it now. Overall, the licensing costs of BMC are a challenge for us in that they're hard costs, whereas open-source monitoring has soft costs, where it's harder to line-item.""We did a five-year, multimillion dollar deal.""Consider scalability very carefully: how much you want to monitor and what components are very important. Then, depending on these two things, filter out unwanted metrics or attributes. If you do a good job at filtering the data, then your licensing costs will be manageable."

More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution has a very good business event manager tool.
Top Answer: We haven't yet established what the final cost would be for licensing this solution, we're still working on that.
Top Answer: I think the solution is overly complex and requires a lot of resources.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
11,723
Comparisons
6,124
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
2,448
Rating
8.4
Views
195
Comparisons
136
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ProactiveNet, TrueSight Operations Management
Learn More
Overview

TrueSight Operations Management is a broad ITOM solution that delivers performance monitoring, event management, end user experience management, AIOps use cases and automated remediation and ticketing . It deploys machine learning and analytics to dynamically learn behavior, correlate, analyze, and prioritize event data so IT operations teams can predict, find and fix issues faster across complex, hybrid environments. TrueSight Operations Management provides a converged view of application and infrastructure performance across physical, virtual, multi-cloud and container environments. With visibility into web, mobile, and on-premises applications, TrueSight provides the insight IT operations needs to deliver high-quality digital services quickly and effectively enough to keep pace with business demands. TrueSight helps IT to ensure that the applications and services that drive the business continue to perform optimally by examining operational norms, automatically revealing abnormalities, measuring service impact, and proactively identifying risk.

JenniferSoft Application Performance Management (APM) is a system management methodology that focuses on monitoring and managing application software performance and service utilization. Also, it is a tool that helps system availability and stable operation by monitoring and analyzing performance of operating systems. JENNIFER provides comprehensive and integrated performance monitoring through its many dashboard views, which include Real-user Monitoring and Real-time Topology. JENNIFER analyzes statistical data regarding system resources, application performance and errors with a view to achieving continuous and optimal service availability. JENNIFER's continuous monitoring helps with rapid detection and troubleshooting of performance problems. That can help prevent the problems from affecting service availability later. And minimizing system downtime and improving overall performance at the application and system levels greatly improves customer satisfaction.

Offer
Learn more about BMC TrueSight Operations Management
Learn more about JenniferSoft
Sample Customers
Ensono, Transamerica, Boston Scientific, Park Place Technologies, inContact, TD Ameritrade, PNC Bank
Standard Charter, SAS, SK, Mini Stop, AIG, SMBC, Prudential, Samsung, 3M, Meritz, LG, CJ, Pasco, Metr Asia Capital
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
Manufacturing Company25%
Government13%
Financial Services Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise85%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 7th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 8 reviews while JenniferSoft is ranked 61st in Application Performance Management (APM). BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while JenniferSoft is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "Knowledge Modules are what make the implementation across our varied infrastructure, but RBAC controls need some work". On the other hand, BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with Splunk, Dynatrace, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, BMC Helix Monitor and AppDynamics, whereas JenniferSoft is most compared with Dynatrace.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.