We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Vulnerability Management and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Takes reports from other vulnerabilities."
"The tool provides us insight into the happens of the network and its hosts. It provides me with a list of hosts."
"The predictive prioritization features are pretty good. They do a lot of research and we trust the research that they do internally. They have knowledge of what's going on with many companies, where we only get a view into what's going on here. So the ability to get best practices out of them as part of this solution, is valuable to us."
"What is useful to me is being able to fulfill very customized scanning policies. In the clinical environment, because of vendor control, we can't perform credential-vulnerability scanning. And network scans, which I've done before, can cause a lot of impact. Being able to create very customized policies to be able to routinely scan and audit our clinical networks, while simultaneously not causing impact, is important to us."
"The solution is very intuitive and the dashboards are simple to use."
"It basically reviews our threat landscape vulnerability."
"We use Tenable to scan all of our environments and plugins for vulnerabilities. Tenable helps us discover network vulnerabilities to threats and piracy."
"We really love the Security Center dashboard. It basically performs vulnerability scanning and then outputs a vulnerability data."
"The product is our second solution, and we are happy that it meets our requirements."
"No third-party applications or integrations with additional software solutions."
"Tenable's reporting engine needs improvement. It needs to be more efficient and add more features."
"Tenable SC could be improved with additional connectivity to external company postures and the capability of managing and sustaining agents in the systems directly without additional platforms in the middle."
"The GUI could be improved to have all concerns and priorities use the same GUI, allowing them to see all tickets, assign vulnerabilities, and assign variation failures to each member of their team."
"The reporting needs a lot of work on the template."
"Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."
"The biggest issue I have with the solution is when I'm using the scanning it picks up the original DNS of that device. That means, before we image it and actually change the DNS to something within our company structure, it'll just be random numbers and letters and Tenable will stick to that DNS for a long time."
"Tenable SC can improve by making it easier to create complicated reports and have more effectiveness in the remediation area for comparison between the scans."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
Earn 20 points
BMC TrueSight Vulnerability Management is ranked 46th in Vulnerability Management while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 47 reviews. BMC TrueSight Vulnerability Management is rated 7.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Vulnerability Management writes "Good features for infrastructure application; lacking in integrations with other software ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "Reliable, useful reports, but initial report configuration could improve". BMC TrueSight Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR and Tenable Nessus, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.