Compare BOC ADONIS vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
33,629 views|21,833 comparisons
BOC ADONIS Logo
1,321 views|1,064 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about BOC ADONIS vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill.""For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.""We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.""I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."

More Camunda BPM Pros »

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered.""We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

More BOC ADONIS Pros »

"No matter what somebody's technical experience level is, the tool can start adding value immediately. Even if that is just an analyst who doesn't have any technical background, they can use some of these no quote accelerators to get things from ideation to deployment in a matter of minutes.""It helps develop applications very quickly. Once clients get used to it and familiar with the methodology, then they don't feel so locked in. It is able to add this element of agility to our clients' software development lifecycle. That is my favorite thing about it: You're not so locked in as you used to be when developing applications.""One of the most valuable features is the way that they are adapting to the market. Initially, it was doing only workflow. Now it has started bringing all the other components like rules within the workflow and then the integration with RPA.""It has integrated UI and deployment models, and it has a deep set of consultant and service provider ecosystem features.""It has had a positive effect on decision-making in my organization. It helps us with our dispute process.""It gives us the ability to create toolkits and use them across many different applications. It allows us to write things one time, instead of having to write a diary for every single different application. We can write at once and reuse it.""The workflow of BAW's automation is handled inside of BPM, so we can see what state it is at and how things are processing through.""The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pros »

Cons
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI.""The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options.""When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.""I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder."

More Camunda BPM Cons »

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available.""If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

More BOC ADONIS Cons »

"I would definitely like to see a unified interface between the BPM side of the house and the case side of the house. Something that just seems a bit more cohesive, because right now there is sort of a disconnect between the BPM and the case side of the house. That makes it a bit of a hard sell sometimes. That is definitely first and foremost on my wish list.""From what I understand, in the next release they're actually going to combine all of this together as one integrated solution... If we could have one unified way to build a solution, that would really help.""I would like to see more streamlined install and provisioning; preferably containerized IBM BPM would be helpful.""Every client is moving to the cloud. We are still a little behind with IBM, but we are catching up from my point of view.""The development UI is sometimes a little slow.""The UI of the solution is not good. They should work to update the solution and make it better and fresher.""The setup and installation process could be made easier.""In terms of improvement, it could be less complex."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.""We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"The solution has saved us time.""There is still a relatively high total cost of ownership to actually implement, support, and stand up solutions.""Nowadays, clients are looking at pricing as one of the major factors. For IBM products, they always think it is expensive for them. We are still educating our clients on the IBM FlexPoints licensing."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are… more »
Top Answer: It's free, open-source. I use the open-source free version.
Top Answer: Hi dear knauf its pleasure to see you in a good position, you were always in the top of specialist. your advise and… more »
Top Answer: We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem.
Top Answer: One of the weak points is that you can't just export so I'd like to see an improvement in exporting features. If you're… more »
Top Answer: We have two primary use cases for the solution. Firstly, it's the basis for process affirmation and secondly, we use it… more »
Top Answer: The business process modeling is the most valuable feature.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, it could be less complex. It's quite a complicated software.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Business Automation Workflow
Learn
camunda
BOC Group
IBM
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
BOC ADONIS is a Business Process Management designs the process landscape, current (AS-IS) as well as future (TO-BE) processes, publishes and administrate work instructions on a daily basis, it can create and optimise integrated internal control and risk management to identify and assess and control the risks of your organisation. The process cost analysis in ADONIS provides you with a transparent view on the origin of costs and allows a clear allocation of the different cost types.

IBM Business Automation Workflow combines business process management and case management capabilities in one workflow solution. It integrates the capabilities of business process and case management into a single workflow offering. It unites information, process, and users to provide a 360-degree view of work to drive more successful optimized business outcomes. IBM Business Automation Workflow on Cloud provides the same capabilities that are offered in the IBM Business Automation Workflow offering, all within a ready-to-use, cloud-based environment that is hosted in IBM Cloud data centers and managed by IBM.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about BOC ADONIS
Learn more about IBM Business Automation Workflow
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentTelefonica, Generali, Allianz, Southern Water, Glencore, ERGOKey Bank, Barclays, Control€xpert, MIR Insurance Brokers, Conqord Oil
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Comms Service Provider25%
Non Profit17%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider23%
Government9%
University8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company9%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business48%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise36%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise69%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about BOC ADONIS vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BOC ADONIS is ranked 28th in Business Process Management with 2 reviews while IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 11th in Business Process Management with 10 reviews. BOC ADONIS is rated 7.6, while IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of BOC ADONIS writes "A time-saving and efficient product with fantastic support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "The tool is great for rolling processes out quickly without being too locked into them". BOC ADONIS is most compared with ARIS BPM, Bizagi, Signavio Process Manager, BIC Cloud BPM and IBM BPM, whereas IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Apache Airflow and IBM Case Foundation. See our BOC ADONIS vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow report.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.