Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"The solution is scalable."
"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."
"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"The content management is great."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"Camunda is much cheaper."
"I use the open-source free version."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
Information Not Available
"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
Questions from the Community
Question: What do you like most about Camunda BPM?
Top Answer: The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are… more »
Top Answer: It's free, open-source. I use the open-source free version.
Question: What do you like most about BOC ADONIS?
Top Answer: We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem.
Question: What needs improvement with BOC ADONIS?
Top Answer: One of the weak points is that you can't just export so I'd like to see an improvement in exporting features. If you're… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents… more »
Top Answer: Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive. Two models are available and it depends on which… more »
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 65% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
|Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager|
Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.
Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:
|BOC ADONIS is a Business Process Management designs the process landscape, current (AS-IS) as well as future (TO-BE) processes, publishes and administrate work instructions on a daily basis, it can create and optimise integrated internal control and risk management to identify and assess and control the risks of your organisation. The process cost analysis in ADONIS provides you with a transparent view on the origin of costs and allows a clear allocation of the different cost types.||IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.|
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about BOC ADONIS
Learn more about IBM Case Foundation
|AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent||Telefonica, Generali, Allianz, Southern Water, Glencore, ERGO||Suncorp Group Limited|
Financial Services Firm33%
Comms Service Provider25%
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm7%
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider23%
No Data Available
No Data Available
See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.