Bonita vs IBM Case Foundation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bonitasoft Logo
4,877 views|3,165 comparisons
IBM Logo
529 views|430 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bonita and IBM Case Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features.""The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried.""Bonita is user-friendly.""Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness.""The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable.""One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform.""Development of forms and flows.""It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."

More Bonita Pros →

"A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.""Case Foundation provides a strong security boost.""The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well.""It's very easy.""Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great.""It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events.""The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features.""The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."

More IBM Case Foundation Pros →

Cons
"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components.""I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation.""The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve.""It is missing some important features that other products have.""I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful.""There is a considerable learning curve.""Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product.""I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

More Bonita Cons →

"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM.""There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer""Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly.""​The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications.​""The interface needs to be more user-friendly.""There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings.""The cloud version could use more stability.""90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."

More IBM Case Foundation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."
  • "Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."
  • "I believe this is a very good financial choice."
  • "The Community Edition comes free of charge."
  • "We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."
  • "Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."
  • More Bonita Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
  • "This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
  • "IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
  • "The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."
  • More IBM Case Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:The user interface is easy to use.
    Top Answer: A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.
    Top Answer:The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either. I would rate it five out of ten.
    Top Answer:There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,877
    Comparisons
    3,165
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    366
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    529
    Comparisons
    430
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    536
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Bonita BPM
    Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.
    IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.
    Sample Customers
    With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.
    Suncorp Group Limited
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company20%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government14%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bonita is ranked 11th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 27 reviews while IBM Case Foundation is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Bonita is rated 8.2, while IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". Bonita is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow and ProcessMaker, whereas IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow and IBM BPM. See our Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.