We performed a comparison between Bonita and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."
"Development of forms and flows."
"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."
"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."
"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."
"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."
"Its user-friendliness, along with the availability of comprehensive and clear documentation on the website is the most valuable."
"The user interface is easy to use."
"It is a scalable product."
"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"K2 is reasonably priced."
"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."
"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."
"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."
"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."
"We are struggling a bit with integrations."
"There is a considerable learning curve."
"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."
"It is missing some important features that other products have."
"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."
"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
Bonita is ranked 11th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 27 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Bonita is rated 8.2, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Bonita is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow and Oracle BPEL, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our Bonita vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
