We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and IBM App Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The platform is user-friendly."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"It has been a stable product."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"It's stable to use, connect with the cloud, and to deploy."
"Technical support is good."
"When using IBM stacks, IBM App Connect is suitable and integrates well with other IBM products like WebSphere."
"It has different type of interfaces that can integrate with companies."
"The most valuable feature is the security."
"We use IBM App Connect for the integration between the applications."
"Very scalable, flexible, and user-friendly."
"It has an efficient design flow."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"IBM needs to enhance and have a stronger offering for the event streaming part because this is the future needed for the containerization and the new integration requirement."
"The interface could be better."
"The setup time for App Connect could be improved."
"It is not easy to deploy. It requires someone with a high level of knowledge in the solution to deploy it, not just anyone can do it."
"When we do a version upgrade of the system, the platform is kind of complicated."
"IBM App Connect should improve security features."
"They reply in one or two hours at most, but they could be better."
"The product should improve its support."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while IBM App Connect is ranked 11th in Cloud Data Integration with 20 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while IBM App Connect is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM App Connect writes "Very flexible and user-friendly; embeds with other technologies; no dependency on queue manager". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas IBM App Connect is most compared with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration, Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server, IBM InfoSphere DataStage and TIBCO BusinessWorks. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. IBM App Connect report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
