We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
"The technical support must be improved."
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and FME. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
