We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Matillion ETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"Matillion ETL has great Git integration that is perfect and convenient to use."
"The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL."
"It is an incredibly user-friendly and intuitive tool, making the learning curve quite smooth"
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is the UI experience in which you can drag and drop most of the transformation."
"It's highly scalable. It takes upon itself the Redshift scalability, so it's very good."
"It has improved the costs of managing my customer’s data."
"It's been able to do everything we require."
"The product has a good user interface."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"The product must enhance its near-real-time data capture feature."
"Unlike Snowflake which automatically takes care of upgrading to the latest version and includes additional features, with Matillion ETL we need to do this ourselves."
"Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes simultaneously at the entry level."
"To complete the pipeline, they might want to include some connectors which would put the data into different platforms. This would be helpful."
"The cost of the solution is high and could be reduced."
"There are certain functions that are available in other ETL tools which are still not present in Matillion ETL. It would be good to have more features."
"Sometimes, we have issues with the solution's stability and need to restart it for three weeks or more."
"In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 24 reviews while Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 22 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Matillion ETL is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas Matillion ETL is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Snowflake, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Matillion ETL report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.