Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs Matillion ETL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Matillion ETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Matillion ETL Report (Updated: July 2023).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product's initial setup phase was easy.""Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable.""The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool.""The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development.""This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background.""AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations.""It is easy to learn and implement.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pros →

"Matillion ETL has great Git integration that is perfect and convenient to use.""The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL.""It is an incredibly user-friendly and intuitive tool, making the learning curve quite smooth""The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is the UI experience in which you can drag and drop most of the transformation.""It's highly scalable. It takes upon itself the Redshift scalability, so it's very good.""It has improved the costs of managing my customer’s data.""It's been able to do everything we require.""The product has a good user interface."

More Matillion ETL Pros →

Cons
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available.""It crashes if we run high-volume integration.""There should be more scripting possibilities.""The product's UI could be more convenient.""Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area.""The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that.""They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage.""Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Cons →

"The product must enhance its near-real-time data capture feature.""Unlike Snowflake which automatically takes care of upgrading to the latest version and includes additional features, with Matillion ETL we need to do this ourselves.""Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes simultaneously at the entry level.""To complete the pipeline, they might want to include some connectors which would put the data into different platforms. This would be helpful.""The cost of the solution is high and could be reduced.""There are certain functions that are available in other ETL tools which are still not present in Matillion ETL. It would be good to have more features.""Sometimes, we have issues with the solution's stability and need to restart it for three weeks or more.""In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases."

More Matillion ETL Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."
  • "They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."
  • "The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."
  • "This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."
  • "The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."
  • "When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
  • "The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."
  • "Approximately 20k annually."
  • More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I have heard from my manager and other higher ups, "This product is cheaper than other things on the market," and they have done the research."
  • "It is cost-effective. Based on our use case, it's efficient and cheap. It saves a lot of money and our upfront costs are less."
  • "The prices needs to be lower."
  • "It was very easy to purchase through the AWS Marketplace, but it was also expensive."
  • "Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace is pretty convenient. There is a little bit of back and forth in terms of the licensing based on the machine size, but it seems to have worked out well. it is convenient to have it all as part of our AWS billing."
  • "It is not necessarily a cheap solution. However, it's reasonable priced, especially with the smaller machines that we run it on."
  • "The AWS pricing and licensing are a cost-effective solution for data integration needs."
  • "It was procured through the AWS Marketplace because it keeps things simple. They offer retail-like checkout and bill through your existing Amazon Web Services account."
  • More Matillion ETL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have worked as an Integration Architect/Developer for many years and have used Mulesoft, Boomi, Informatica, Workato, Celigo, SSIS and many other integration tools.  The tool you would pick depends… more »
    Top Answer:Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.
    Top Answer:It is an incredibly user-friendly and intuitive tool, making the learning curve quite smooth
    Top Answer:We pay $5.40 per EC2 running hour, and we can reduce costs by stopping and starting the EC2 instances strategically. For instance, in our production environment, we run it for sixteen hours a day… more »
    Top Answer:There's room for improvement in how it handles data streaming capabilities. Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,323
    Comparisons
    1,631
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    7.4
    4th
    Views
    3,495
    Comparisons
    2,369
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    701
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Boomi
    Matillion ETL for Redshift, Matillion ETL for Snowflake, Matillion ETL for BigQuery
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

    Matillion ETL is a powerful tool for extracting, transforming, and loading large amounts of data from various sources into cloud data warehouses like Snowflake. Its ability to load data dynamically and efficiently using metadata is a standout feature, as is its open-source ETL with good performance and high efficiency. 

    The solution has a graphical interface for jobs, is easily adjustable and extensible, and allows for scheduling and error reporting. Matillion ETL has helped organizations move to a cloud-based solution, bridge the gap between on-premises and on-cloud, and perform complex migration projects.

    Sample Customers
    DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
    Thrive Market, MarketBot, PWC, Axtria, Field Nation, GE, Superdry, Quantcast, Lightbox, EDF Energy, Finn Air, IPRO, Twist, Penn National Gaming Inc
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Outsourcing Company8%
    Retailer8%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer6%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company36%
    Financial Services Firm36%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Matillion ETL
    July 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Matillion ETL and other solutions. Updated: July 2023.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 24 reviews while Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 22 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Matillion ETL is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas Matillion ETL is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Snowflake, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Matillion ETL report.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.