We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"It has been a stable product."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are the triggering based on certain events. You can trigger a Logic App and put your logic behind it and take certain actions. The actions could be anything based on the business logic. For example, if you say something happens, an order comes in, and the order can sit in one of the Azure services. Whenever an order comes in, the Logic App can go look and trigger an event. You can write your logic inside your Logic App and it works similar to a workflow."
"Easy to use and is able to integrate with other Azure-based environments."
"The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
"The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration."
"The product has efficient connectors."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"Documentation could be improved."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."
"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."
"The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"There could be custom code for the product's components."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."
"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 26 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Provides Integration Service Environment (ISE) for content-based routing, data transformation, and enrichment, enhancing integration capabilities". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
