We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and SnapLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"It has been a stable product."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"You can use other languages, such as Python, and easily connect to other systems."
"What I found most valuable in SnapLogic is the ETL feature, particularly the Transform Snap Pack, for example, any kind of reading or writing on Transform Snaps. Other than that, all the third-party connectivity tools such as the SAP Snap Pack, Salesforce Snap Pack, Workday Snap Pack, even the ServiceNow Snap Pack, I find all those are pretty useful in SnapLogic."
"It's more developer-friendly, and development can be done at a faster phase."
"SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."
"SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake."
"They are very good at building out new aspects according to customer requirements."
"The solution could improve its API management."
"SnapLogic is a great platform for establishing integrations among various systems or patterns by using any kind of interface. If something is not supported by predefined snaps – snaps are connectors in SnapLogic – you can create them (custom snaps) or write a script."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"Documentation could be improved."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment."
"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."
"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."
"The dashboards regarding scheduled tasks need further improvement."
"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."
"The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that."
"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."
"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 11 reviews while SnapLogic is ranked 6th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 13 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while SnapLogic is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Offers quick development, an easy setup, and less coding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SnapLogic writes "Automates manual activities and has helpful documentation that allows users to self-study". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas SnapLogic is most compared with Azure Data Factory, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, AWS Glue, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and webMethods Integration Server. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. SnapLogic report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.