We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. webMethods Integration Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Talend and others in Data Integration Tools. Updated: October 2021.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently.""This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background.""The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful.""We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration.""It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI.""Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable.""Low-code development is the most valuable feature."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pros »

"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The tool is very powerful and user-friendly.""The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas.""One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations.""Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today.""The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you.""The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."

More webMethods Integration Server Pros »

Cons
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc.""The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that.""The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle.""We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience.""They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect.""There should be more scripting possibilities.""They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Cons »

"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable.""Technical support is an area where they can improve.""I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration.""The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so.""The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG.""Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time.""It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking.""I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."

More webMethods Integration Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution is very economical (based on the connections).""The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage.""When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product.""The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.""This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced.""It's a good deal for the money that we pay.""Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under.""Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive.""I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors.""The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."

More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration Tools solutions are best for your needs.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable.
Top Answer: There should be more scripting possibilities. Boomi is essentially low-code/no-code — it's very graphically oriented. If you wish to maintain it, then you'll require more scripting language.
Top Answer: We use this solution as normal middleware — for transformation routing. We have around 20-100 clients that use this solution.
Top Answer: It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the… more »
Top Answer: I don't think webMethods is the cheapest but I think the quality is worth it. But it's not cheap. We're satisfied with our choice and the price is not a reason to look for something else.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather… more »
Ranking
Views
8,921
Comparisons
6,909
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
709
Rating
8.3
Views
16,264
Comparisons
11,649
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
1,258
Rating
7.9
Comparisons
Also Known As
Boomi
Learn More
Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about Boomi AtomSphere Integration
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Manufacturing Company5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company18%
Manufacturing Company18%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Insurance Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise42%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise80%
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Talend and others in Data Integration Tools. Updated: October 2021.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 11 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 8.2, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Fairly easy for a semi-technical user to configure and maintain it and is very visual". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Its single hybrid-integration platform makes it easy to troubleshoot and quickly resolve issues. Upgrades are complex". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and SSIS, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, SAP Process Orchestration, Mule Anypoint Platform and Azure Data Factory.

See our list of best Data Integration Tools vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.